Biopsy of the same organ within 30 days: a potential radiology performance measure
- PMID: 33963912
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03103-x
Biopsy of the same organ within 30 days: a potential radiology performance measure
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the potential value of repeat image-guided biopsy within 30 days as a radiology performance metric.
Methods: This was a HIPAA-compliant IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of all consecutive ultrasound- and CT-guided core biopsies of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis performed at one institution November 2016 to June 2020. The inclusion criterion was repeat biopsy of the same organ within 30 days of the initial biopsy. Details of both biopsies were recorded, including indication, organ, post-biopsy histology, performing service, performing provider. Histologic concordance between initial and repeat biopsies was calculated. Proportions and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Results: Repeat biopsy was performed after 1.9% (95% CI 1.5-2.4% [N = 89]) of 4637 initial biopsies. For structures with ≥ 100 biopsies performed, the repeat biopsy proportion ranged from 1.3% (5/378, US-guided renal biopsy) to 2.7% (11/413, CT-guided retroperitoneal biopsy). The most common indication for initial biopsy was possible malignancy (66% [59/89]). The most common indication for repeat biopsy was radiology-histology discrepancy (36% [32/89]). Repeat biopsies were more likely to show malignant cells and to have diagnostic tissue (Repeat: 48.3% malignant; 20.2% benign; 1.1% nondiagnostic; Initial: 25.8% malignant; 23.6% benign; 14.6% nondiagnostic). The most common histology difference after repeat biopsy was a change in malignant diagnosis (38.2% [34/89]).
Conclusion: Repeat percutaneous biopsy within 30 days of the same organ is uncommon (~ 2%), but when indicated, it commonly changes diagnosis and improves diagnostic yield. Repeat biopsy within 30 days is a potential performance measure for radiology procedure services.
Keywords: Biopsy; Cross-sectional; Image-guided; Metric; Quality; Repeat; Value.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous CT-guided needle biopsies of musculoskeletal tumors: a 5-year analysis of non-diagnostic biopsies.Skeletal Radiol. 2015 Dec;44(12):1795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00256-015-2235-0. Epub 2015 Sep 4. Skeletal Radiol. 2015. PMID: 26338069
-
Routine radiology-pathology concordance evaluation of CT-guided percutaneous lung biopsies increases the number of cancers identified.Eur Radiol. 2024 May;34(5):3271-3283. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10353-4. Epub 2023 Oct 20. Eur Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37857902
-
Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jul;43(7):1813-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1337-7. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018. PMID: 29079986
-
Culture yield of repeat percutaneous image-guided biopsy after a negative initial biopsy in suspected spondylodiscitis: a systematic review.Skeletal Radiol. 2018 Oct;47(10):1327-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00256-018-3006-5. Epub 2018 Jun 18. Skeletal Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29915936 Free PMC article.
-
Do benign-concordant breast MRI biopsy results require short interval follow-up imaging? Report of longitudinal study and review of the literature.Clin Imaging. 2019 Sep-Oct;57:50-55. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 16. Clin Imaging. 2019. PMID: 31129391 Review.
References
-
- Keel G, Savage C, Rafiq M, Mazzocato P (2017) Time-driven activity-based costing in health care: A systematic review of the literature. Health Policy 121 (7):755-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.04.013 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blackmore CC (2007) Defining quality in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4 (4):217-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.11.014 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Waite S, Scott JM, Legasto A, Kolla S, Gale B, Krupinski EA (2017) Systemic Error in Radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 209 (3):629-639. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17719 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Moser JW, Wilcox PA, Bjork SS, Cushing T, Dennis M, Greissing JE, Keysor K, McKenzie J, Weinreb JC (2006) Pay for performance in radiology: ACR white paper. J Am Coll Radiol 3 (9):650-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2006.06.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kruskal JB, Kung JW (2015) The 2015 RadioGraphics Monograph Issue: Quality, Safety, and Noninterpretive Skills. Radiographics 35 (6):1627-1629. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015154013 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical