Within- and between-subject biological variation data for tumor markers based on the European Biological Variation Study
- PMID: 33964202
- DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2021-0283
Within- and between-subject biological variation data for tumor markers based on the European Biological Variation Study
Abstract
Objectives: Reliable biological variation (BV) data are required for the clinical use of tumor markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment effects in cancer. The European Biological Variation Study (EuBIVAS) was established by the EFLM Biological Variation Working Group to deliver BV data for clinically important measurands. In this study, EuBIVAS-based BV estimates are provided for cancer antigen (CA) 125, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, cytokeratin-19 fragment, alpha-fetoprotein and human epididymis protein 4.
Methods: Subjects from five European countries were enrolled in the study, and weekly samples were collected from 91 healthy individuals (53 females and 38 males; 21-69 years old) for 10 consecutive weeks. All samples were analyzed in duplicate within a single run. After excluding outliers and homogeneity analysis, the BVs of tumor markers were determined by CV-ANOVA on trend-corrected data, when relevant (Røraas method).
Results: Marked individuality was found for all tumor markers. CYFRA 21-1 was the measurand with the highest index of individuality (II) at 0.67, whereas CA 19-9 had the lowest II at 0.07. The CV I s of HE4, CYFRA 21-1, CA 19-9, CA 125 and CA 15-3 of pre- and postmenopausal females were significantly different from each other.
Conclusions: This study provides updated BV estimates for several tumor markers, and the findings indicate that marked individuality is characteristic. The use of reference change values should be considered when monitoring treatment of patients by means of tumor markers.
Keywords: biological variation; cancer; tumor markers.
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
Comment in
-
Biological variation and reference change value as decision criteria in clinical use of tumor biomarkers. Are they really useful?Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022 Mar 10;60(6):e136-e137. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-0047. Print 2022 May 25. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022. PMID: 35263822 No abstract available.
References
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Cancer. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1 [Accessed March 2021].
-
- Duffy, MJ, Sturgeon, CM, Soletormos, G, Barak, V, Molina, R, Hayes, DF, et al.. Validation of new cancer biomarkers: a position statement from the European group on tumor markers. Clin Chem 2015;61:809–20. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2015.239863.
-
- Fraser, CG. Biological variation: from principles to practice. Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2001.
-
- Coşkun, A, Sandberg, S, Unsal, I, Cavusoglu, C, Serteser, M, Kilercik, M, et al.. Personalized reference intervals in laboratory medicine: a new model based on within-subject biological variation. Clin Chem 2021;67:374–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa233.
-
- Aarsand, AK, Røraas, T, Sandberg, S. Biological variation – reliable data is essential. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:153–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1141.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials