Development of a patient-reported outcome tool for assessing symptom burden during perioperative care in liver surgery: The MDASI-PeriOp-Hep
- PMID: 33964632
- PMCID: PMC8650165
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2021.101959
Development of a patient-reported outcome tool for assessing symptom burden during perioperative care in liver surgery: The MDASI-PeriOp-Hep
Abstract
Purpose: Based on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), we developed a Patient-reported outcomes tool for hepatectomy perioperative care (MDASI-PeriOp-Hep).
Methods: To establish the content validity, we generated PeriOp-Hep-specific candidate items from qualitative interviews of patients (n = 30), and removed items that lacked clinical relevance on the basis of input from panels of patients, caregivers, and clinicians. The psychometric properties of the MDASI-PeriOp-Hep were validated (n = 150). The cognitive debriefing and clinical interpretability were assessed to confirm the ease of comprehension, relevance, and acceptability of the tool.
Results: Five symptoms specific to hepatectomy (abdominal bloating, tightness, or fullness; abdominal cramping; muscle weakness, instability, or vertigo; constipation; and incisional tightness) were identified as module items to form the MDASI-PeriOp-Hep. The Cronbach αs for symptoms and for interference were 0.898 and 0.861, respectively. The test-retest reliability was 0.887 for all 18 symptom severity items. Compared to other commonly used tools, correlation of MDASI-PeriOp-Hep scores to performance status (all, P < 0.001) and to the phase of perioperative care confirmed known-group validity. Convergent validity was excellent against other standard Patient-reported outcomes tools. Cognitive debriefing demonstrated that the MDASI-PeriOp-Hep was an easy to use and understandable tool.
Conclusions: For integrating patient-reported outcomes in perioperative patient care, a procedure-specific tool is desirable. The MDASI-PeriOp-Hep is a valid, reliable, concise tool for measuring symptom severity and functional interference in patients undergoing liver surgery.
Keywords: Cancer; Functional recovery; Liver surgery; MDASI; Patient-reported outcome; Perioperative care; Symptom burden; Validation.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Barsevick AM, Whitmer K, Nail LM, Beck SL, Dudley WN, 2006. Symptom cluster research: conceptual, design, measurement, and analysis issues. J. Pain Symptom Manage 31, 85–95. - PubMed
-
- Blazeby JM, Fayers P, Conroy T, Sezer O, Ramage J, Rees M, 2009. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-LMC21 questionnaire for assessment of patient-reported outcomes during treatment of colorectal liver metastases. Br. J. Surg 96, 291–298. - PubMed
-
- Cella D, Butt Z, Kindler HL, Fuchs CS, Bray S, Barlev A, Oglesby A, 2013. Validity of the FACT Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire for assessing disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Qual. Life Res 22, 1105–1112. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
