Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct 21;51(5):2369-2376.
doi: 10.3906/sag-2005-412.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the obesity-specific quality of life questionnaire: quality of life, obesity, and dietetics (QOLOD) rating scale

Affiliations

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of the Turkish version of the obesity-specific quality of life questionnaire: quality of life, obesity, and dietetics (QOLOD) rating scale

Nimetcan Mehmet Yağma et al. Turk J Med Sci. .

Abstract

Background/aim: Obesity is one of the main public health issues in many countries including Turkey. The aim of the study is to test cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of QOLOD rating scale in the Turkish language.

Materials and methods: This methodological study was conducted among the overweight and obesity people between February-March, 2018 in Ankara Atatürk Training and Research Hospital. The data was collected through self-report and face to face interviews. The QOLOD rating scale has 36 items, a 5-point Likert scale (1–5) is used for each question.

Results: In the study, of the 180 participants, 101 (56.1%) were female, 79 (43.9%) were male, and the mean age was 43.36 ± 14.28 (min-max 18–87) years. According to the CFA, the Turkish version of QOLOD rating scale shows a multidimensional structure consisting of 34 items. Two items (item 11 and item 35) were excluded from the scale according to the CFA. Cronbach’s Alpha value changes between 0.927–0.930.

Conclusion: Finding shows that the Turkish version of QOLOD rating scale had sufficient validity and reliability for Turkish population, had strong psychometric characteristics.

Keywords: Obesity; QOLOD rating scale; Turkish version.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The results of confirmatory factor analysis of the five–factor model of the QOLOD rating scale.

Similar articles

References

    1. Campos P Saguy A Ernsberger P Oliver E Gaesser G. The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic? International Journal of Epidemiology. 2006;35:55–60. - PubMed
    1. Engin A. The definition and prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2017;960:1–17. - PubMed
    1. Bandera EV Fay SH Giovannucci E Leitzmann MF Marklew R The use and interpretation of anthropometric measures in cancer epidemiology: a perspective from the world cancer research fund international continuous update project. International Journal of Cancer. 2016;1:2391–2397. - PubMed
    1. BMI classification percentile and cut off points. StatPearls Publishing. 2021. pp. 31082114–31082114. - PubMed
    1. Obesity as a Growing Public Health Problem in Adiposity - Epidemiology and Treatment Modalities 2017.

LinkOut - more resources