Attitudes and perspectives of older adults on technologies for assessing frailty in home settings: a focus group study
- PMID: 33964887
- PMCID: PMC8105977
- DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02252-4
Attitudes and perspectives of older adults on technologies for assessing frailty in home settings: a focus group study
Abstract
Background: The rapid development of technology such as sensors and artificial intelligence in recent years enables monitoring frailty criteria to assess frailty early and accurately from a remote location such as a home. However, research shows technologies being abandoned or rejected by users due to a lack of compatibility and consumer involvement in selecting their assistive technology devices. This study aims to understand older adults' perceptions and preferences of technologies that can potentially assess frailty at home.
Methods: This study collected qualitative data through focus group meetings with 15 participants ages 65 and older. Researchers asked participants questions to achieve the goal of understanding their attitudes on the technologies. These questions include (1) the concerns or barriers of installing and using the presented technology in daily life at home, (2) the reasons participants like or dislike a particular technology, (3) what makes a specific technology more acceptable, and (4) participants' preferences in choosing technologies. Data were transcribed, coded and categorized, and finally synthesized to understand the attitudes towards presented technologies.
Results: Three focus group sessions were conducted with five participants in each session. In the findings, the attitudes and perspectives of participants on the technologies for assessing frailty were categorized into four themes: (A) general attitude towards using the technologies, (B) conditions for accepting certain technologies, (C) existing living habits or patterns related to using the technologies, and (D) constructive suggestions related to the technologies.
Conclusions: Participants generally had positive attitudes towards allowing the technologies to be installed and used at their homes. They would accept some technologies if used under certain conditions. However, questions and concerns remain, such as concerns about privacy, functionality, and aesthetics. The study also found that older adults' living habits or patterns could affect the design and use of technology. Lastly, many valuable suggestions have been made by participants. These perspectives and insights can help improve the design and adoption of home-based frailty assessment technologies among older adults.
Keywords: Assessment; Attitudes; Focus Group; Frailty; In-Home Health Monitoring; Sensors; Technology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Comprehensive Senior Technology Acceptance Model of Daily Living Assistive Technology for Older Adults With Frailty: Cross-sectional Study.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 10;25:e41935. doi: 10.2196/41935. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37036760 Free PMC article.
-
Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of "smart home" technologies: a pilot study.Med Inform Internet Med. 2004 Jun;29(2):87-94. doi: 10.1080/14639230410001684387. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004. PMID: 15370989
-
Exploring Older Adults' Perspectives and Acceptance of AI-Driven Health Technologies: Qualitative Study.JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 12;8:e66778. doi: 10.2196/66778. JMIR Aging. 2025. PMID: 39937162 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying models of care to improve outcomes for older people with urgent care needs: a mixed methods approach to develop a system dynamics model.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(14):1-183. doi: 10.3310/NLCT5104. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37830206 Review.
-
Does smart home technology prevent falls in community-dwelling older adults: a literature review.Inform Prim Care. 2014;21(3):105-12. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v21i3.64. Inform Prim Care. 2014. PMID: 25207613 Review.
Cited by
-
The Development and Concurrent Validity of a Multi-Sensor-Based Frailty Toolkit for In-Home Frailty Assessment.Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 6;22(9):3532. doi: 10.3390/s22093532. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35591222 Free PMC article.
-
Interdisciplinary perspectives on privacy awareness in lifelogging technology development.J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2023;14(3):2291-2312. doi: 10.1007/s12652-022-04486-5. Epub 2022 Dec 12. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2023. PMID: 36530469 Free PMC article.
-
Effective engagement in computerized cognitive training for older adults.Ageing Res Rev. 2025 Feb;104:102650. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2024.102650. Epub 2025 Jan 2. Ageing Res Rev. 2025. PMID: 39755175 Review.
-
Benefits and Barriers of Technology for Home Function and Mobility Assessment: Perspectives of Older Patients With Blood Cancers, Caregivers, and Clinicians.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023 Apr;7:e2200171. doi: 10.1200/CCI.22.00171. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023. PMID: 37098230 Free PMC article.
-
Setting a Patient-Driven Agenda for Cancer Research Priorities in Geriatric Oncology: A Qualitative Study.Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023 Aug;39(4):151463. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151463. Epub 2023 Jul 5. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2023. PMID: 37419848 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Morley JE, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: A call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2013 Jun;14(6):392–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525861013001825 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: A systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc [Internet]. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487–92. Available from: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x - PubMed
-
- Basic D, Shanley C. Frailty in an older inpatient population. J Aging Health [Internet]. 2015 Jun 19;27(4):670–85. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0898264314558202 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster J-Y, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Heal [Internet]. 2015 Dec 10;73(1):19. Available from: https://archpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13690-015-0068-x - PMC - PubMed
-
- Schwenk M, Mohler J, Wendel C, D’’Huyvetter K, Fain M, Taylor-Piliae R, et al. Wearable sensor-based in-home assessment of gait, balance, and physical activity for discrimination of frailty status: Baseline results of the Arizona Frailty Cohort Study. Gerontology [Internet]. 2015;61(3):258–67. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/369095 - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources