Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 8;21(1):298.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02252-4.

Attitudes and perspectives of older adults on technologies for assessing frailty in home settings: a focus group study

Affiliations

Attitudes and perspectives of older adults on technologies for assessing frailty in home settings: a focus group study

Chao Bian et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: The rapid development of technology such as sensors and artificial intelligence in recent years enables monitoring frailty criteria to assess frailty early and accurately from a remote location such as a home. However, research shows technologies being abandoned or rejected by users due to a lack of compatibility and consumer involvement in selecting their assistive technology devices. This study aims to understand older adults' perceptions and preferences of technologies that can potentially assess frailty at home.

Methods: This study collected qualitative data through focus group meetings with 15 participants ages 65 and older. Researchers asked participants questions to achieve the goal of understanding their attitudes on the technologies. These questions include (1) the concerns or barriers of installing and using the presented technology in daily life at home, (2) the reasons participants like or dislike a particular technology, (3) what makes a specific technology more acceptable, and (4) participants' preferences in choosing technologies. Data were transcribed, coded and categorized, and finally synthesized to understand the attitudes towards presented technologies.

Results: Three focus group sessions were conducted with five participants in each session. In the findings, the attitudes and perspectives of participants on the technologies for assessing frailty were categorized into four themes: (A) general attitude towards using the technologies, (B) conditions for accepting certain technologies, (C) existing living habits or patterns related to using the technologies, and (D) constructive suggestions related to the technologies.

Conclusions: Participants generally had positive attitudes towards allowing the technologies to be installed and used at their homes. They would accept some technologies if used under certain conditions. However, questions and concerns remain, such as concerns about privacy, functionality, and aesthetics. The study also found that older adults' living habits or patterns could affect the design and use of technology. Lastly, many valuable suggestions have been made by participants. These perspectives and insights can help improve the design and adoption of home-based frailty assessment technologies among older adults.

Keywords: Assessment; Attitudes; Focus Group; Frailty; In-Home Health Monitoring; Sensors; Technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morley JE, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G, Anker SD, Bauer JM, Bernabei R, et al. Frailty consensus: A call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2013 Jun;14(6):392–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1525861013001825 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collard RM, Boter H, Schoevers RA, Oude Voshaar RC. Prevalence of frailty in community-dwelling older persons: A systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc [Internet]. 2012 Aug;60(8):1487–92. Available from: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04054.x - PubMed
    1. Basic D, Shanley C. Frailty in an older inpatient population. J Aging Health [Internet]. 2015 Jun 19;27(4):670–85. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0898264314558202 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckinx F, Rolland Y, Reginster J-Y, Ricour C, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Burden of frailty in the elderly population: perspectives for a public health challenge. Arch Public Heal [Internet]. 2015 Dec 10;73(1):19. Available from: https://archpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13690-015-0068-x - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schwenk M, Mohler J, Wendel C, D’’Huyvetter K, Fain M, Taylor-Piliae R, et al. Wearable sensor-based in-home assessment of gait, balance, and physical activity for discrimination of frailty status: Baseline results of the Arizona Frailty Cohort Study. Gerontology [Internet]. 2015;61(3):258–67. Available from: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/369095 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources