Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 May 8;12(1):32.
doi: 10.1186/s13229-021-00443-9.

Examining a stepped-care telehealth program for parents of young children with autism: a proof-of-concept trial

Allison L Wainer  1 , Zachary E Arnold  2 , Caroline Leonczyk  3 , Latha Valluripalli Soorya  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Examining a stepped-care telehealth program for parents of young children with autism: a proof-of-concept trial

Allison L Wainer et al. Mol Autism. .

Abstract

Background: Intervention during the first years of life for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may have the strongest impact on long-term brain development and functioning. Yet, barriers such as a shortage of trained professionals contribute to significant delays in service. The goal of this proof-of-concept study was to explore strategies that support timely and equitable deployment of ASD-specific interventions.

Methods: This 15-week, randomized proof-of-concept study explored the acceptability of a digital parent mediated intervention online reciprocal imitation training (RIT; a naturalistic developmental behavioral intervention) and compared it to a treatment as usual (TAU) control on parent and child outcomes. Eligible children were between 18 and 60 months, met the cutoff for ASD on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2nd Edition and demonstrate significant social imitation deficits. Primary outcomes include the acceptability of RIT (Scale of Treatment Perceptions) and the feasibility of the Online RIT digital intervention (online RIT attributes). Secondary outcomes included parent fidelity (RIT parent fidelity form) and parental self-efficacy (Early Intervention Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale). Exploratory outcome measures included child social communication (Social Communication Checklist), child imitation skills (Unstructured Imitation Assessment), and family quality of life (Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale).

Results: Twenty participants were randomized in a 1:1 fashion. The acceptability and feasibility of RIT and the Online RIT digital intervention were rated highly. Among the secondary outcomes, there were significant group differences in parent fidelity (p < .001) and self-efficacy (p = .029). On exploratory outcomes, there were group differences in child social communication (p = .048). There were no significant group differences in imitation ability (p = .05) or family quality of life (p = .22).

Limitations: There are several limitations with this study, including the small sample size as well as lack of data on enactment and website engagement. This study was not able to address questions related to which variables predict program engagement and treatment response, which will be critical for determining which families may benefit from such a stepped-care delivery model.

Conclusions: Overall, the Online RIT program delivered in a stepped-care format shows strong acceptability and holds promise as an innovative delivery model. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04467073. Registered 10 July 2020- Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04467073.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Digital intervention; Online RIT; Reciprocal imitation training; Stepped-care; Telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

AW serves as a consultant and trainer in RIT for community-based organizations. CL, ZA, and LS declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Stepped-care procedures
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Zwaigenbaum L, Bauman ML, Choueiri R, Kasari C, Carter A, Granpeesheh D, et al. Early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder under 3 years of age: recommendations for practice and research. Pediatrics. 2015;136(Supplement 1):S60–S81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3667E. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Webb SJ, Jones EJ, Kelly J, Dawson G. The motivation for very early intervention for infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorders. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2014;16(1):36–42. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.861018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karpur A, Lello A, Frazier T, Dixon PJ, Shih AJ. Health disparities among children with autism spectrum disorders: analysis of the National Survey of Children’s Health 2016. J Autism Dev Disord. 2019;49(4):1652–1664. doi: 10.1007/s10803-018-3862-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elder JH, Brasher S, Alexander B. Identifying the barriers to early diagnosis and treatment in underserved individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and their families: a qualitative study. Issues Mental Health Nurs. 2016;37(6):412–420. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2016.1153174. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee IAC. 2017 Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee strategic plan for autism spectrum disorder. Retrieved from the US Department of Health and Human Services Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee website 2017. Retrieved from https://iacchhsgov/publications/strategic-plan/2017/.

Publication types

Associated data