Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Aug;64(8):1725-1736.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05456-w. Epub 2021 May 8.

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy is associated with reduced retinopathy progression compared with multiple daily injections of insulin

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy is associated with reduced retinopathy progression compared with multiple daily injections of insulin

Laura J Reid et al. Diabetologia. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: We aimed to compare diabetic retinopathy outcomes in people with type 1 diabetes following introduction of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy with outcomes in people receiving continuing therapy with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI).

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study using the Scottish Care Information - Diabetes database for retinal screening outcomes and HbA1c changes in 204 adults commenced on CSII therapy between 2013 and 2016, and 211 adults eligible for CSII during the same period but who continued on MDI therapy. Diabetic retinopathy progression (time to minimum one-grade worsening in diabetic retinopathy from baseline grading) was plotted for CSII and MDI cohorts using Kaplan-Meier curves, and outcomes were compared using multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, baseline HbA1c, blood pressure, cholesterol, smoking status and socioeconomic quintile. Impact of baseline HbA1c and change in HbA1c on diabetic retinopathy progression was assessed within CSII and MDI cohorts.

Results: CSII participants were significantly younger, were from less socially deprived areas, and had lower HbA1c and higher diastolic BP at baseline. There was a larger reduction in HbA1c at 1 year in those on CSII vs MDI (-6 mmol/mol [-0.6%] vs -2 mmol/mol [-0.2%], p < 0.01). Diabetic retinopathy progression occurred in a smaller proportion of adults following commencement of CSII vs continued MDI therapy over mean 2.3 year follow-up (26.5% vs 18.6%, p = 0.0097). High baseline HbA1c (75 mmol/mol [9%]) was associated with diabetic retinopathy progression in the MDI group (p = 0.0049) but not the CSII group (p = 0.93). Change in HbA1c at follow-up, irrespective of baseline glycaemic status, did not significantly affect diabetic retinopathy progression in either group.

Conclusions/interpretation: CSII was associated with reduced diabetic retinopathy progression compared with continued MDI therapy, and may be protective against diabetic retinopathy progression for those with high baseline HbA1c. Progression of diabetic retinopathy over 3 years was not associated with a change in HbA1c.

Keywords: Clinical diabetes; Clinical science; Insulin therapy; Microvascular complications; Retinopathy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart showing number of people assessed and analysed for CSII and MDI groups and exclusions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Retinopathy in comparator treatment groups (a) and HbA1c subgroups (be). Kaplan–Meier survival plots compare event-free survival rates in CSII/MDI treatment groups (a) and HbA1c subgroups (be). An event corresponds to diabetic retinopathy progression and was defined as a minimum one-grade worsening in either eye from the baseline grading. Vertical dashes indicate participants who were censored due to incomplete 3 year follow-up. (a) Comparison of CSII (blue) and MDI (red) participants for the entire cohort. CSII was associated with significantly reduced retinopathy progression over 3 years compared with MDI (p=0.0097). (b, c) Comparison of participants with baseline HbA1c <58 mmol/mol (7.5%) (low: lilac), 58–75 mmol/mol (7.5–9%) (middle: blue) or >75 mmol/mol (9%) (high: red) in the CSII group (b) and the MDI group (c). High baseline HbA1c (>75 mmol/mol [9%]) was associated with increased diabetic retinopathy progression in the MDI group (p=0.0049) but was not a determinant of diabetic retinopathy progression in the CSII group (p=0.93). (d, e) Comparison of unmatched participants with change in HbA1c at 1 year of less than −5 mmol/mol (0.5%) (decrease: lilac), −5 to 5 mmol/mol (0.5 to 0.5%) (stable: blue) or more than 5 mmol/mol (0.5%) (increase: red) in the CSII group (d) and the MDI group (e). Change in HbA1c at follow-up did not significantly impact diabetic retinopathy progression in either cohort

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(3):556–564. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leasher JL, Bourne RR, Flaxman SR, et al. Global Estimates on the Number of People Blind or Visually Impaired by Diabetic Retinopathy: A Meta-analysis From 1990 to 2010. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(9):1643–1649. doi: 10.2337/dc15-2171. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nathan DM. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Study at 30 Years: Overview. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:9–16. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2112. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feldman-Billard S, Larger E, Massin P. Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy after rapid improvement of blood glucose control in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44(1):4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2017.10.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diabetic Retinopathy Guidelines Expert Working Party (2012) The Royal College of Ophthalmologists Diabetic Retinopathy Guidelines December 2012. Available from https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/2013-SCI-301-FINAL-.... Accessed 10 Jun 2020

Publication types

MeSH terms