Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
- PMID: 33966729
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.03.013
Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer
Abstract
Objective: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome in an influential prospective, randomized trial. However, many centers worldwide performing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have data and experience that prove otherwise. We aim to review surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients operated by Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital, by experienced surgeons and standardization in radicality, for cervical carcinoma Stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009 to May 2014.
Materials & methods: Standardised surgical technique with Parametrium & Paracolpium resection approach was adopted by qualified and experienced Gynecologic/Gyne-Oncologic Endoscopic & Minimally Invasive Surgeons in performing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009-May 2014, involving 53 patients. Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) Of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Tertiary Referral Centre), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology was accessed for surgical and oncologic outcomes.
Results: Fifty-Three patients operated from January 2009 to May 2014 were followed up for an average of 96.7 months with longest follow-up at 127 months. There were no cases of recurrence or death reported. 5 Year - Survival Rate and 5 Year Disease-Free Survival Rate were 100%. Two patients received post-operative pelvic radiation concurrent with chemotherapy using Cisplatin due to greater than 1/3 cervical stromal invasion.
Conclusion: It is vital to standardize minimally invasive surgical techniques for early stage cervical cancer, with focus on adequate radicality and resection which may contribute to excellent survival outcomes. Further international multi-center randomized trial (Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy In Cervical Cancer) will provide justification for continued practice of MIS in early stage cervical cancer.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy; MITOR.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest Drs. Chyi-Long LEE, Kuan-Gen HUANG, Peng Teng CHUA, Marie Christine Valerie R. MENDOZA, Siew Yen LAI has no Conflict of interest or funding/financial ties to disclose. Ms. Pei San LEE has no Conflict of interest or funding/financial ties to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Survival outcomes of single-port access laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer.Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;34:140-145. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 Apr 17. Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32891319
-
Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):619.e1-619.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31288006
-
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff - a multicenter analysis.Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Jun;29(5):845-850. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000388. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31155516
-
Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jul 1;6(7):1019-1027. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694. JAMA Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32525511 Free PMC article.
-
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15. Eur J Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32422504 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Survival Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Radical Hysterectomy in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 24;14(9):2117. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092117. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35565246 Free PMC article.
-
The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082192. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35456285 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Impaction of Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy for Lymphovascular Space Invasion of Early Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022 Feb 14;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_121_20. eCollection 2022 Jan-Mar. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2022. PMID: 35310130 Free PMC article.
-
The New Concepts from New Evidences.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025 Feb 27;14(1):1-2. doi: 10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00064. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2025. PMID: 40143978 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
From Radical Hysterectomy to Radical Surgery for Deep Endometriosis.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Feb 9;12(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_140_22. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023. PMID: 37025439 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical