Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;48(4):413-439.
doi: 10.3233/NRE-210026.

Distance-limited walk tests post-stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties

Darren Kai-Young Cheng  1   2 , Matthieu Dagenais  2 , Kyla Alsbury-Nealy  1   2 , Jean Michelle Legasto  1   2 , Stephanie Scodras  1   2 , Gayatri Aravind  3 , Pam Takhar  1 , Erica Nekolaichuk  4 , Nancy Margaret Salbach  1   2   5
Affiliations

Distance-limited walk tests post-stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties

Darren Kai-Young Cheng et al. NeuroRehabilitation. 2021.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Improving walking capacity is a key objective of post-stroke rehabilitation. Evidence describing the quality and protocols of standardized tools for assessing walking capacity can facilitate their implementation.

Objective: To synthesize existing literature describing test protocols and measurement properties of distance-limited walk tests in people post-stroke.

Methods: Electronic database searches were completed in 2017. Records were screened and appraised for quality.

Results: Data were extracted from 43 eligible articles. Among the 12 walk tests identified, the 10-metre walk test (10mWT) at a comfortable pace was most commonly evaluated. Sixty-three unique protocols at comfortable and fast paces were identified. Walking pace and walkway surface, but not walkway length, influenced walking speed. Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability ranged from 0.80-0.99 across walk tests. Measurement error values ranged from 0.04-0.40 and 0.06 to 0.20 for the 10mWT at comfortable and fast and paces, respectively. Across walk tests, performance was most frequently correlated with measures of strength, balance, and physical activity (r = 0.26-0.8, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The 10mWT has the most evidence of reliability and validity. Findings indicate that studies that include people with severe walking deficits, in acute and subacute phases of recovery, with improved quality of reporting, are needed.

Keywords: Gait; assessment; measurement properties; rehabilitation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NMS is an author on 5 articles included in this review. DKC is an author on 1 article included in this review. PT is an author on 1 article included in this review. Otherwise, the authors declare no conflicts of interest. Funding for this project is provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart & Stroke Foundation, Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery, and Canadian Frailty Network. NMS holds the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Chair at the University of Toronto.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
COSMIN Reliability (N = 11 articles) and Measurement Error (N = 7 articles). Abbreviations: ICC, Intraclass correlation coefficient; ME, measurement error; Rel, reliability. COSMIN Scoring: 1, very good; 2, adequate; 3, doubtful; 4, inadequate. 1Measurement error values were not reported in the article, but computed by study authors using published data; thus, COSMIN checklist was not completed.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
COSMIN Construct Validity (N = 33 articles). Abbreviations: HT, hypothesis testing. COSMIN Scoring: 1, very good; 2, adequate; 3, doubtful; 4, inadequate. 1Evaluated predictive validity only. 2Evaluated predictive validity and concurrent construct validity.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
COSMIN Sensitivity to Change (N = 3 articles). Abbreviations: SC, Sensitivity to Change; SRM, Standardized response mean. COSMIN Scoring: 1, very good; 2, adequate; 3, doubtful; 4, inadequate.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agyenkwa, S. K., Yarfi, C., Banson, A. N., Kofi-Bediako, W. A., Abonie, U. S., Angmorterh, S. K., & Ofori, E. K. (2020). Assessing the use of standardized outcome measures for stroke rehabilitation among physiotherapists in Ghana. Stroke Research and Treatment, 10.1155/2020/9259017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed, S., Mayo, N. E., Higgins, J., Salbach, N. M., Finch, L., & Wood-Dauphinée, S. L. (2003). The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): a comparison with other measures used to evaluate effects of stroke and rehabilitation. Physical Therapy 83(7), 617–630. - PubMed
    1. Alzahrani, M. A., Dean, C. M., & Ada, L. (2009). Ability to negotiate stairs predicts free-living physical activity in community-dwelling people with stroke: An observational study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 55(4), 277–281. 10.1016/s0004-9514(09)70008-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andresen, E. M. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81(12 Suppl 2), S15–20. 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Katz, J. N., Wright, J. G., Wells, G., Boers, M., Strand, V., & Shea, B. (2001). Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. The Journal of Rheumatology 28(2), 400–405. - PubMed

Publication types