Within-visit and between-visit intra-individual blood pressure variability in an unselected adult population from rural China
- PMID: 33967241
- DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002810
Within-visit and between-visit intra-individual blood pressure variability in an unselected adult population from rural China
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between the variability of blood pressure (BP) readings within an initial clinic visit, the variability within subsequent visits and the variability between visits over 1 week in a general population.
Methods: This study included 1401 adult residents, who were not taking antihypertensive drugs, having BP measurements at three visits over 1 week. The difference between maximal and minimal BP readings (ΔBP), ΔBP/BPm (the mean BP value in a visit), the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (coefficient of variation = SD × 100/mean) of three BP values in each visit were used to estimate the within-visit BP variability (BPV). The SD and coefficient of variation of all nine BP readings over the three visits were calculated as SD9 or CV9 to reflect the overall BPV during the study visits. The SD and coefficient of variation on the mean BP values (BPm) of three visits were computed as SD-3 or CV-3, whereas the difference between maximal and minimal BP in three visits was computed as ΔBP-3 to estimate visit-to-visit BPV. The average BP or HR was the mean values of nine BP or HR readings over three visits.
Results: The systolic and diastolic mean BP (SBP and DBP) decreased from the first to the third visit. The ΔBP, SD and coefficient of variation for both SBP and DBP at the first visit were positively and significantly correlated with the corresponding variables computed at the second and third visits, as well as with overall BPV (ΔBP9, SD9 and CV9). A positive correlation was also found between overall BPV and visit-to visit BPV (SD-3, CV-3 and ΔBP9). Multivariate analysis showed: no association between average SBP and systolic coefficient of variation or ΔBP/BPm but a negative association between average DBP and coefficient of variation or ΔBP/BPm for DBP at the first visit, DBP-3 and DBP9. Age was positively correlated with coefficient of variation or ΔBP/BPm for SBP at the first visit, SBP-3 and SBP9, and correlated with coefficient of variation and ΔBP/BPm for DBP only at the first visit.
Conclusion: In a general population, within-visit BPV at an initial visit is associated with within-visit BPV at subsequent visits and with visit-to-visit BPV over three visits within 1 week.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Number of blood pressure measurements needed to estimate long-term visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability for predicting cardiovascular risk: a 10-year retrospective cohort study in a primary care clinic in Malaysia.BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 20;9(4):e025322. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025322. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31005918 Free PMC article.
-
The prognostic value of long-term visit-to-visit blood pressure variability on stroke in real-world practice: a dynamic cohort study in a large representative sample of Chinese hypertensive population.Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 20;177(3):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.09.149. Epub 2014 Oct 30. Int J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25449513 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of doxazosin mesylate versus nifedipine on blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients: a randomized crossover study (SIMILAR).Blood Press Monit. 2019 Oct;24(5):252-258. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000388. Blood Press Monit. 2019. PMID: 31116151 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of amlodipine and other classes of antihypertensive drugs on long-term blood pressure variability: evidence from randomized controlled trials.J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014 May;8(5):340-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 15. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2014. PMID: 24685006 Review.
-
Methodological factors affecting quantification of blood pressure variability: a scoping review.J Hypertens. 2018 Apr;36(4):711-719. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001606. J Hypertens. 2018. PMID: 29176390
References
-
- Parati G, Stergiou G, Dolan E, Bilo G. Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application. J Clin Hypertens 2018; 20:1133–1137.
-
- Whelton P, Carey R, Aronow W, Casey D, Collins K, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2018; 138:e426–e483.
-
- Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2018; 36:1953–2041.
-
- Su H, Wang J, Zhu Y, Wang G, Cheng X. Discrepancy among three blood pressure readings within one measurement and relevant influencing factors. Blood Press Monit 2010; 15:152–157.
-
- Parati G, Ochoa J, Lombardi C, Bilo G. Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013; 10:143–155.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical