Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 28;27(16):1751-1769.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i16.1751.

Preoperative physiological esophageal assessment for anti-reflux surgery: A guide for surgeons on high-resolution manometry and pH testing

Affiliations
Review

Preoperative physiological esophageal assessment for anti-reflux surgery: A guide for surgeons on high-resolution manometry and pH testing

Michael Yodice et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most commonly encountered digestive diseases in the world, with the prevalence continuing to increase. Many patients are successfully treated with lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitor therapy, but a subset of patients require more aggressive intervention for control of their symptoms. Surgical treatment with fundoplication is a viable option for patients with GERD, as it attempts to improve the integrity of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). While surgery can be as effective as medical treatment, it can also be associated with side effects such as dysphagia, bloating, and abdominal pain. Therefore, a thorough pre-operative assessment is crucial to select appropriate surgical candidates. Newer technologies are becoming increasingly available to help clinicians identify patients with true LES dysfunction, such as pH-impedance studies and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Pre-operative evaluation should be aimed at confirming the diagnosis of GERD, ruling out any major motility disorders, and selecting appropriate surgical candidates. HRM and pH testing are key tests to consider for patients with GERD like symptoms, and the addition of provocative measures such as straight leg raises and multiple rapid swallows to HRM protocol can assess the presence of underlying hiatal hernias and to test a patient's peristaltic reserve prior to surgery.

Keywords: Anti-reflux surgery; Fundoplication; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; High resolution manometry; Pre-operative assessment; pH-impedance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors disclose no conflicts of interest or external funding for this publication.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Twenty-four hours pH studies. A: Normal 24 h pH study showing acid in the stomach without acid reflux events in the esophagus; B: Abnormal 24 h pH monitoring test with multiple acid reflux events in the esophagus (star indicating reflux events).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Abnormal wireless capsule pH study (arrows indicating prolonged reflux events).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples of pH-impedance measurements. A: Reflux event recorded during 48 h pH-impedance study; B: Weak acid reflux event in the esophagus without acid exposure in the stomach detected on pH-impedance study (arrows indicating impedance events, star indicating pH drop and acid event).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Utility of pH and multichannel intraluminal impendence pH testing for pre-operative assessment. GERD: Gastroesophageal reflux disease; NERD: Non-erosive reflux disease; PPI: Proton pump inhibitor; AET: Acid exposure time; MII-pH: Multichannel intraluminal impendence pH monitoring.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Utility of high-resolution manometry for pre-operative assessment. LES: Lower esophageal sphincter.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Normal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter relaxation on high-resolution manometry. A: Example of normal swallow on high-resolution manometry; B: Normal swallow with complete esophageal clearance by impedance.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Examples of achalasia diagnosed on high-resolution manometry. A: Type I achalasia with failure of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and absence of peristalsis; B: Type II achalasia with panesophageal pressurization; C: Type III achalasia with abnormal peristalsis (spastic/premature contractions).
Figure 8
Figure 8
Scleroderma esophagus with absent peristalsis and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Outflow obstruction with elevated residual pressure and distal pressurization from chronic opioid use.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Example of hypercontractile esophagus with distal contractile integral > 8000 mmHg.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Findings on high-resolution manometry with multiple rapid swallow. A: Normal multiple rapid swallow (MRS) with good contraction distal contractile integral; B: Weak esophageal contractions with MRS; C: Failed esophageal contractions with MRS.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Examples of straight leg raise testing during high-resolution manometry. A: Normal straight leg raise test with single pressurization zone; B: Two pressurization zones after straight leg raise indicating presence of small hiatal hernia; C: Example of two pressurization zones after straight leg raise in patient with large hiatal hernia (Arrows indicate pressurization zones).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. El-Serag HB, Sweet S, Winchester CC, Dent J. Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut. 2014;63:871–880. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dent J, Becher A, Sung J, Zou D, Agréus L, Bazzoli F. Systematic review: patterns of reflux-induced symptoms and esophageal endoscopic findings in large-scale surveys. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 863-873. :e3. - PubMed
    1. Patti MG. An Evidence-Based Approach to the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:73–78. - PubMed
    1. Gawron AJ, French DD, Pandolfino JE, Howden CW. Economic evaluations of gastroesophageal reflux disease medical management. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:745–758. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:308–28; quiz 329. - PubMed