Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr 21:15:595507.
doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.595507. eCollection 2021.

The Hidden Brain: Uncovering Previously Overlooked Brain Regions by Employing Novel Preclinical Unbiased Network Approaches

Affiliations
Review

The Hidden Brain: Uncovering Previously Overlooked Brain Regions by Employing Novel Preclinical Unbiased Network Approaches

Sierra Simpson et al. Front Syst Neurosci. .

Abstract

A large focus of modern neuroscience has revolved around preselected brain regions of interest based on prior studies. While there are reasons to focus on brain regions implicated in prior work, the result has been a biased assessment of brain function. Thus, many brain regions that may prove crucial in a wide range of neurobiological problems, including neurodegenerative diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders, have been neglected. Advances in neuroimaging and computational neuroscience have made it possible to make unbiased assessments of whole-brain function and identify previously overlooked regions of the brain. This review will discuss the tools that have been developed to advance neuroscience and network-based computational approaches used to further analyze the interconnectivity of the brain. Furthermore, it will survey examples of neural network approaches that assess connectivity in clinical (i.e., human) and preclinical (i.e., animal model) studies and discuss how preclinical studies of neurodegenerative diseases and neuropsychiatric disorders can greatly benefit from the unbiased nature of whole-brain imaging and network neuroscience.

Keywords: fMRI; graph theory; iDISCO; iDISCO+; immunohistochemistry; modularity; network neuroscience.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Number of publications listed on PubMed for 197 brain region terms searched for based on the Allen Mouse Brain Atlas (Allen Institute for Brain Science, 2004) nomenclature. The top nine brain regions represent 75% of the total publications, while the remaining 188 regions searched only represent 25% of total publications.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Network properties and uses in preclinical studies. (A) Graphical example of small-world and highly modular networks. (B) Workflow for preclinical network analysis using Fos as a marker for neural activity. Animals first undergo a behavioral, pharmacological, or alternative manipulation to induce neural activity. Brains are collected and then processed to identify Fos protein expression using one of several immunostaining and imaging strategies. The main strategies are: (1) traditional immunohistochemistry and microscopy on Fos stained sliced brain tissue, (2) whole brain immunostaining/clearing of Fos and light-sheet microscopy, and (3) serial two-photon imaging of fluorescent brain slices. Once data is collected from any given imaging strategy, functional connectivity networks can be delineated by calculating Pearson correlations of Fos activity from one brain region to another brain region across animals in a given treatment group. This is done for all brain regions expressing Fos to create a functional connectivity matrix. The functional connectivity matrix can be used to create a modular network that contains brain regions grouped based on function (e.g., stress, pain, or reward). Network analysis can then reveal novel functions for brain regions with other known roles and additionally, the function of overlooked and understudied brain regions can be identified. This workflow will be useful for identifying novel brain regions that contribute to neuropsychiatric diseases in the future.

References

    1. Abe Y., Sekino M., Terazono Y., Ohsaki H., Fukazawa Y., Sakai S., et al. (2012). Opto-fMRI analysis for exploring the neuronal connectivity of the hippocampal formation in rats. Neurosci. Res. 74 248–255. 10.1016/j.neures.2012.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Achard S., Bullmore E. (2007). Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3:e17. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Achard S., Salvador R., Whitcher B., Suckling J., Bullmore E. (2006). A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J. Neurosci. 26 63–72. 10.1523/jneurosci.3874-05.2006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn Y. Y., Bagrow J. P., Lehmann S. (2010). Link communities reveal multiscale complexity in networks. Nature 466 761–764. 10.1038/nature09182 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akiki T. J., Averill C. L., Wrocklage K. M., Scott J. C., Averill L. A., Schweinsburg B., et al. (2018). Default mode network abnormalities in posttraumatic stress disorder: a novel network-restricted topology approach. Neuroimage 176 489–498. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.005 - DOI - PMC - PubMed