Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;5(2):105-114.
doi: 10.18001/trs.5.2.2.

The Impact of Nicotine Dose on the Reinforcing Value of Cigarettes in Adolescents

Affiliations

The Impact of Nicotine Dose on the Reinforcing Value of Cigarettes in Adolescents

Rachel N Cassidy et al. Tob Regul Sci. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: The FDA is considering the implementation of a national nicotine reduction policy for cigarettes, and such a policy may reduce the reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes and ultimately reduce tobacco dependence. However, it is not yet known how different levels of nicotine may affect the reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes in adolescents. We aimed to determine how reduced nicotine content may affect adolescents' demand for cigarettes using the cigarette purchase task (CPT).

Methods: Adolescent daily smokers (ages 15-19, n = 50) completed a CPT for their usual brand cigarette and for each dose of SPECTRUM research cigarettes (15.8, 5.2, 1.3, 0.4 mg nicotine/g tobacco) during four laboratory sessions. We conducted repeated measures ANOVAs to evaluate the effect of nicotine dose on five demand indices derived from the CPT.

Results: Tests revealed significantly higher demand for usual brand than each research cigarette dose (all p's < .01); dose did not significantly affect any measure when usual brand was excluded.

Conclusions: These results demonstrate the potential utility of the CPT for comparing the reinforcing efficacy of cigarettes varying in nicotine content in adolescents, and indicate a significantly reduced reinforcing efficacy of all research cigarettes relative to usual brand.

Keywords: adolescent; nicotine; regulatory science; smoking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean and standard deviation of intensity, breakpoint, Omax, and Pmax across dose.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean fitted curves of demand for cigarettes across dose.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percent of participants reporting that they would smoke zero cigarettes if they were free at each dose. Asterisks denote a significant difference relative to usual brand.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Congress. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (H.R. 1256). U.S.G.P.O., Washington; 2009.
    1. Gottlieb S, Zeller M. A Nicotine-Focused Framework for Public Health. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12). doi:10.1056/NEJMp1707409. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Donny EC, Denlinger RL, Tidey JW, et al. Randomized Trial of Reduced-Nicotine Standards for Cigarettes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(14):1340–1349. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1502403. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hatsukami DK, Heishman SJ, Vogel RI, et al. Dose-response effects of spectrum research cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(6):1113–1121. doi:10.1093/ntr/nts247. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. USDHHS. Preventing Tobacco Use Among Youth and Young Adults. 2016. https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/preventing-youth-tobacco-.... Accessed August 29, 2017.

LinkOut - more resources