Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4200-4212.
doi: 10.1002/sim.9023. Epub 2021 May 9.

Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to simultaneously estimate the absolute risk of different event types: Cumulative total failure probability may exceed 1

Peter C Austin  1   2   3 , Ewout W Steyerberg  4   5 , Hein Putter  5
Affiliations

Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to simultaneously estimate the absolute risk of different event types: Cumulative total failure probability may exceed 1

Peter C Austin et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

The Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model has become the default method to estimate the incidence of outcomes over time in the presence of competing risks. This model is attractive because it directly relates covariates to the cumulative incidence function (CIF) of the event of interest. An alternative is to combine the different cause-specific hazard functions to obtain the different CIFs. A limitation of the subdistribution hazard approach is that the sum of the cause-specific CIFs can exceed 1 (100%) for some covariate patterns. Using data on 9479 patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, we estimated the cumulative incidence of both cardiovascular death and non-cardiovascular death for each patient. We found that when using subdistribution hazard models, approximately 5% of subjects had an estimated risk of 5-year all-cause death (obtained by combining the two cause-specific CIFs obtained from subdistribution hazard models) that exceeded 1. This phenomenon was avoided by using the two cause-specific hazard models. We provide a proof that the sum of predictions exceeds 1 is a fundamental problem with the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model. We further explored this issue using simulations based on two different types of data-generating process, one based on subdistribution hazard models and other based on cause-specific hazard models. We conclude that care should be taken when using the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model in situations with wide risk distributions or a high cumulative incidence, and if one is interested in the risk of failure from each of the different event types.

Keywords: cause-specific hazard function; competing risks; cumulative incidence function; subdistribution hazard; survival analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Five‐year cumulative incidence [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Difference between those with TFP ≤ 1 and TFP > 1 [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Total failure probability
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Probability of total failure probability exceeding 1 [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Koller MT, Raatz H, Steyerberg EW, Wolbers M. Competing risks and the clinical community: irrelevance or ignorance? Stat Med. 2012;31(11–12):1089‐1097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc. 1999;94:496‐509.
    1. Putter H, Fiocco M, Geskus RB. Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi‐state models. Stat Med. 2007;26(11):2389‐2430. - PubMed
    1. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. Vol 2. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 2002.
    1. Therneau T, Crowson C, Atkinson E. Multi‐state models and competing risks. 2020. https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/compete.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2021.

Publication types

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources