Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr 29;92(0):e1-e4.
doi: 10.4102/jsava.v92i0.2096.

Detection and analysis of tick-borne infections in communal dogs of northwest Zimbabwe

Affiliations

Detection and analysis of tick-borne infections in communal dogs of northwest Zimbabwe

Melissa A Kennedy et al. J S Afr Vet Assoc. .

Abstract

Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) may serve as a reservoir or a sentinel for infectious disease pathogens that can affect human and wildlife health. To understand the role of tick-borne diseases in rural and lesser developed regions, we investigated the prevalence of several tick-borne pathogens in communal dogs of Zimbabwe. Blood samples from 225 dogs in northwest Zimbabwe were assessed by serology for Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi, and 241 samples were assessed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for Ehrlichia. There was a high seroprevalence (73%) of E. canis-specific antibodies in domestic dogs in northwest Zimbabwe, but follow up analyses via PCR and genetic sequencing indicated only 7.5% of the canines were actively infected with the organism. Whilst indicating that an organism serologically related to E. canis is likely present in the region, this data also shows that the organism is currently present in a relative minority of the domestic dogs in the region. Its presence as evidenced by both serologic and PCR analysis is significant because of the 'one health' paradigm, where humans and wildlife may be affected by the exposure to this pathogen in domestic dogs.

Keywords: Ehrlichia; Southern Africa; canine; one health; tick.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allsopp, M.T.E.P. & Allsopp, B.A., 2001, ‘Novel Ehrlichia genotype detected in dogs in South Africa’, Journal of Clinical Microbiology 39(11), 4204–4207. 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4204-4207.2001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Branger, S., Rolain, J.M. & Raoult, D., 2004, ‘Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibilities of Ehrlichia canis, Ehrlichia chaffeensis, and Anaplasma phagocytophilum by real-time PCR’, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48(12), 4822–4828. 10.1128/AAC.48.12.4822-4828.2004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brouqui, P., Le Cam, C., Kelly, P.J., Laurens, R., Tounkara, A., Sawadogo, S. et al. , 1994, ‘Serologic evidence for human ehrlichiosis in Africa’, European Journal of Epidemiology 10(6), 695–698. 10.1007/BF01719283 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cleaveland, S., Kaare, M., Knobel, D. & Laurenson, M.K., 2006, ‘Canine vaccination – Providing broader benefits for disease control’, Veterinary Microbiology 117(1), 43–50. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.04.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dantas-Torres, F., Chomel, B.B. & Otranto, D., 2012, ‘Ticks and tick-borne diseases: A one health perspective’, Trends in Parasitology 28(10), 437–446. 10.1016/j.pt.2012.07.003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources