Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 3;4(5):e218401.
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8401.

Preeclampsia Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Pregnancy Outcomes in Sweden and China

Yingying Yang  1   2 , Isabelle Le Ray  2   3 , Jing Zhu  4   5 , Jun Zhang  4 , Jing Hua  1 , Marie Reilly  2
Affiliations

Preeclampsia Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Pregnancy Outcomes in Sweden and China

Yingying Yang et al. JAMA Netw Open. .

Abstract

Importance: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Within-country studies have reported racial differences in the presentation and outcome, but little is known about differences between countries.

Objective: To compare preeclampsia prevalence, risk factors, and pregnancy outcomes between the Swedish and Chinese populations.

Design, setting, and participants: This cross-sectional study compared deliveries from the Swedish national Medical Birth Register (2007-2012) and the China Labor and Delivery Survey (2015-2016). The Swedish Medical Birth Register records maternal, pregnancy, and neonatal information for nearly all deliveries in Sweden. The China Labor and Delivery Survey was conducted throughout China, and these data were reweighted to enable national comparisons. Participants included 555 446 deliveries from Sweden and 79 243 deliveries from China. Data management and analysis was conducted from November 2018 to August 2020 and revised in February to March 2021.

Exposures: Maternal characteristics, parity, multiple gestation, chronic and gestational diabetes, cesarean delivery.

Main outcomes and measures: Preeclampsia prevalence and risk factors, overall and for mild and severe forms and rates of adverse neonatal outcomes compared with pregnancies with no gestational hypertension.

Results: The 555 446 Swedish pregnancies and 79 243 Chinese pregnancies had mean (SD) maternal age of 30.9 (5.3) years and 28.6 (4.6) years, respectively. The overall prevalence of preeclampsia was similar in Sweden and China, 16 068 (2.9%) and 1803 (2.3%), respectively, but with 5222 cases (32.5%) considered severe in Sweden and 1228 cases (68.1%) considered severe in China. Obesity (defined as BMI ≥28 in China and BMI ≥30 in Sweden) was a stronger risk factor in China compared with Sweden (China: odds ratio [OR], 5.12; 95% CI, 3.82-6.86; Sweden: OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 3.31-3.67). Nulliparity had a much stronger association with severe preeclampsia in Sweden compared with China (Sweden: OR, 3.91; 95% CI, 3.65-4.18; China: OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.20-2.25). The overall stillbirth rate for singleton in China was more than 3-fold higher than in Sweden (846/77 512[1.1%] vs 1753/547 219 [0.3%], P < .001), and 10-fold higher among women with preeclampsia (66/1652 [4.6%] vs 60/14 499[0.4%], P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, the prevalence rates of preeclampsia in Sweden and China were similar, but women in China had more severe disease and worse pregnancy outcomes than women in Sweden. The associations of obesity and nulliparity with preeclampsia suggest a role for lifestyle and health care factors but may reflect some differences in pathophysiology. These findings have relevance for current efforts to identify high-risk pregnancies and early serum markers because the value of risk prediction models and biomarkers may be population specific.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: No disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Flowchart of the Study Population in Sweden and Surveyed Sample in China
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Adjusted Odds Ratios for Risk Factors Associated With Mild Preeclampsia and Severe Preeclampsia From Multivariable Logistic Regression for Sweden and Weighted Logistic Regression for China
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Comparison of Adverse Outcomes of Singleton Pregnancies Associated With Preeclampsia in Sweden and China
Pregnancies with no gestational hypertension are included as reference.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kuklina EV, Ayala C, Callaghan WM. Hypertensive disorders and severe obstetric morbidity in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1299-1306.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&li... doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a45b25 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tranquilli AL, Brown MA, Zeeman GG, Dekker G, Sibai BM; Statements from the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) . The definition of severe and early-onset preeclampsia. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2013;3(1):44-47. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2012.11.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. . Erratum to “the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention” [Int J Gynecol Obstet 145 Suppl. 1 (2019) 1-33]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;146(3):390-391. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12892 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown MA, Magee LA, Kenny LC, et al. ; International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP) . The hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis and management recommendations for international practice. Pregnancy Hypertension. 2018;13:291-310. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2018.05.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abalos E, Cuesta C, Grosso AL, Chou D, Say L. Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):1-7. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.005 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types