Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;35(3):265-275.
doi: 10.1037/neu0000720.

Socioeconomic and psychosocial mechanisms underlying racial/ethnic disparities in cognition among older adults

Affiliations

Socioeconomic and psychosocial mechanisms underlying racial/ethnic disparities in cognition among older adults

Laura B Zahodne et al. Neuropsychology. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: Racial/ethnic disparities in cognitive aging are only partly attributable to socioeconomic indicators. Psychosocial factors, such as discrimination and perceived control, also differ across racial/ethnic groups, and emerging literature highlights their potential role in contributing to cognitive disparities in addition to socioeconomic status. Method: 1,463 older adults (51% Hispanic, 27% non-Hispanic Black, and 22% non-Hispanic White) in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project completed cognitive and psychosocial measures, including a comprehensive neuropsychological battery, Everyday and Major Experiences of Lifetime Discrimination scales, and the Perceived Control scale. Mediation models quantified separate indirect effects of Black race and Hispanic ethnicity on global cognitive composite scores through education, income, discrimination, and external perceived control. Results: Educational attainment, income, and perceived control each mediated racial/ethnic disparities in global cognition. Socioeconomic indicators (i.e., lower education and lower income) explained approximately 50% of the Black-White and Hispanic-White disparities in global cognition, and more external perceived control explained an additional 5%-8%. Hispanics reported the lowest levels of discrimination, while non-Hispanic Blacks reported the highest levels. However, neither everyday nor major lifetime discrimination was associated with global cognition. Significant racial/ethnic disparities in global cognition remained after accounting for the included socioeconomic and psychosocial factors. Conclusions: This study suggests that psychosocial factors may explain racial/ethnic disparities in cognitive aging above and beyond socioeconomic indicators. More external perceived control, which could reflect chronic exposure to interpersonal and institutional marginalization, may be a particularly salient psychosocial risk factor for poorer cognitive aging among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic older adults. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mediation model. Significant paths are shown as black lines, with corresponding standardized parameter estimates and standard errors. Non-significant paths are depicted with gray, dotted lines. For simplicity, covariates (i.e., age, sex/gender) and covariances between mediators are not shown.

References

    1. Aggarwal NT, Wilson RS, Beck TL, Rajan KB, Mendes De Leon CF, Evans DA, & Everson-Rose SA (2014). Perceived stress and change in cognitive function among adults 65 years and older. Psychosomatic Medicine. 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000016 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiken Morgan AT, Sims RC, & Whitfield KE (2010). Cardiovascular health and education as sources of individual variability in cognitive aging among African Americans. Journal of Aging and Health, 22(4), 477–503. 10.1177/0898264310361627 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. (1987). DSM III-R. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders––Third Revised Version.
    1. Bandura A (1981). Self-referent thought: A developmental analysis of self-efficacy. In Flavell & Ross L (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200–239). Cambridge University Press.
    1. Bandura A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action : a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1986.