Efficacy and safety of voclosporin versus placebo for lupus nephritis (AURORA 1): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
- PMID: 33971155
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00578-X
Efficacy and safety of voclosporin versus placebo for lupus nephritis (AURORA 1): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial
Erratum in
-
Department of Error.Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2048. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01160-0. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34062140 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Voclosporin, a novel calcineurin inhibitor approved for the treatment of adults with lupus nephritis, improved complete renal response rates in patients with lupus nephritis in a phase 2 trial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of voclosporin for the treatment of lupus nephritis.
Methods: This multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial was done in 142 hospitals and clinics across 27 countries. Patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with lupus nephritis according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria, and a kidney biopsy within 2 years that showed class III, IV, or V (alone or in combination with class III or IV) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to oral voclosporin (23·7 mg twice daily) or placebo, on a background of mycophenolate mofetil (1 g twice daily) and rapidly tapered low-dose oral steroids, by use of an interactive web response system. The primary endpoint was complete renal response at 52 weeks defined as a composite of urine protein creatinine ratio of 0·5 mg/mg or less, stable renal function (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥60 mL/min/1·73 m2 or no confirmed decrease from baseline in eGFR of >20%), no administration of rescue medication, and no more than 10 mg prednisone equivalent per day for 3 or more consecutive days or for 7 or more days during weeks 44 through 52, just before the primary endpoint assessment. Safety was also assessed. Efficacy analysis was by intention-to-treat and safety analysis by randomised patients receiving at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03021499.
Findings: Between April 13, 2017, and Oct 10, 2019, 179 patients were assigned to the voclosporin group and 178 to the placebo group. The primary endpoint of complete renal response at week 52 was achieved in significantly more patients in the voclosporin group than in the placebo group (73 [41%] of 179 patients vs 40 [23%] of 178 patients; odds ratio 2·65; 95% CI 1·64-4·27; p<0·0001). The adverse event profile was balanced between the two groups; serious adverse events occurred in 37 (21%) of 178 in the voclosporin group and 38 (21%) of 178 patients in the placebo group. The most frequent serious adverse event involving infection was pneumonia, occurring in 7 (4%) patients in the voclosporin group and in 8 (4%) patients in the placebo group. A total of six patients died during the study or study follow-up period (one [<1%] patient in the voclosporin group and five [3%] patients in the placebo group). None of the events leading to death were considered by the investigators to be related to the study treatments.
Interpretation: Voclosporin in combination with MMF and low-dose steroids led to a clinically and statistically superior complete renal response rate versus MMF and low-dose steroids alone, with a comparable safety profile. This finding is an important advancement in the treatment of patients with active lupus nephritis.
Funding: Aurinia Pharmaceuticals.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests BHR reports personal fees from Aurinia, Callidatis, ChemoCentryx, Retrophin, Novartis, Morphosys, EMD Serono, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Omeros, and AstraZeneca; non-financial support from Lupus Foundation of America; and grants from National Institutes of Health (NIH), outside the submitted work. YKOT reports consultancy fees from Aurinia, during the conduct of the study. EMG was a site primary investigator for clinical trials funded by Aurinia. CA reports personal fees from Aurinia, during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and GlaxoSmithKline; and grants from Exagen, outside the submitted work. DJC reports grants from NIH; and personal fees from Aurinia, Calliditas, GlaxoSmithKline, and Retrophin, outside the submitted work. JR-D participated in Aurinia clinical trials. KG reports grants and personal fees from Aurinia, and Retrophin; grants from Bristol Meyer Squibb; and personal fees from Reata, outside the submitted work. JK reports personal fees from and is a stakeholder of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. SN was a consultant or participated in speaker bureau for Astellas, Pfizer, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Johnson and Johnson; received educational and research grants from Astellas and Aurinia; and participated in Aurinia clinical trials. SVP was a consultant for Aurinia, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb; received research funding from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, EMD Serono, Aurinia, and Mallinckrodt; and participated in clinical trials of Aurinia. NS is an employee and stockholder of Aurinia and has an issued patent (number 10286036, on a voclosporin dosing protocol). LL, SR, and RBH are employees and stockholders of Aurinia.
Comment in
-
A new old treatment for lupus nephritis.Lancet. 2021 May 29;397(10289):2027-2029. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00663-2. Epub 2021 May 7. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 33971151 No abstract available.
-
Voclosporin improves outcomes in lupus nephritis.Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Jul;17(7):378. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00638-7. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021. PMID: 34040229 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous