Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 10;22(1):431.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04276-8.

Effect of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire with two Kirschner wires on fixation strength for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures: an in vitro study with artificial bone

Affiliations

Effect of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire with two Kirschner wires on fixation strength for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures: an in vitro study with artificial bone

Yung-Cheng Chiu et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Metacarpal shaft fractures are a common type of hand fracture. Despite providing strong fixation strength, plate fixation has numerous shortcomings. Concerning internal fixation with Kirschner wires (K-wires), although this approach is frequently used to treat metacarpal shaft fractures, the lack of functional stability may result in fixation failure.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of figure-of-eight cerclage wire on fixation for transverse metacarpal shaft fractures using two K-wires.

Materials and methods: We used a saw blade to create transverse metacarpal shaft fractures in 14 fourth-generation artificial third metacarpal bones (Sawbones, Vashon, WA, USA), which were assigned to groups undergoing fixation with two K-wires (KP) or with two K-wires and figure-of-eight cerclage wire (KP&F8). All specimens were subjected to material testing, specifically cantilever bending tests. The maximum fracture force and stiffness of the two fixation types were determined on the basis of the force-displacement data. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare between-group differences in maximum fracture force and stiffness.

Results: The maximum fracture force of the KP group (median ± interquartile range = 97.30 ± 29.70 N) was significantly lower than that of the KP&F8 group (153.2 ± 69.50 N, p < 0.05; Figure 5a), with the median of the KP&F8 group exceeding that of the KP group by 57.5%. Similarly, stiffness was significantly lower in the KP group (18.14 ± 9.84 N/mm) than in the KP&F8 group (38.25 ± 23.49 N/mm; p < 0.05; Figure 5b), with the median of the KP&F8 group exceeding that of the KP group by 110.9%.

Conclusion: The incorporation of a figure-of-eight cerclage wire increased the maximum fracture force and stiffness by 57.5 and 110.9%, respectively, compared with those achieved in standard two K-wire fixation. Therefore, hand surgeons are advised to consider the proposed approach to increase fixation strength.

Keywords: Figure-of-eight cerclage wire; K-wire; Metacarpal shaft fracture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Artificial metacarpal bones with transverse shaft fractures. a Lateral view. b Cross-sectional view
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Artificial metacarpal bones with transverse shaft fracture subjected to fixation. a Two K-wire fixation. b Two K-wire fixation with a figure-of-eight cerclage wire. The top and bottom images present the lateral and dorsal views, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radiographs of the specimens. a Two K-wire fixation. b Two K-wire fixation with a figure-of-eight cerclage wire. The top and bottom images present the lateral and dorsal views, respectively
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Experimental setup for the cantilever bending tests
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Box plot showing the a maximum fracture force and b stiffness of the specimens. *p < 0.05

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dreyfuss D, Allon R, Izacson N, Hutt D. A comparison of locking plates and intramedullary pinning for fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. HAND. 2019;14(1):27–33. doi: 10.1177/1558944718798854. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakashian MN, Pointer L, Owens BD, Wolf JM. Incidence of metacarpal fractures in the US population. Hand. 2012;7(4):426–430. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9442-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Curtis BD, Fajolu O, Ruff ME, Litsky AS. Fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures: biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail crossed K-wires and plate-screw constructs. Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):256–260. doi: 10.1111/os.12195. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kollitz KM, Hammert WC, Vedder NB, Huang JI. Metacarpal fractures: treatment and complications. Hand. 2014;9(1):16–23. doi: 10.1007/s11552-013-9562-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Macdonald BB, Higgins A, Kean S, Smith C, Lalonde DH. Long-term follow-up of unoperated, nonscissoring spiral metacarpal fractures. Plastic Surg. 2014;22(4):254–258. doi: 10.1177/229255031402200406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed