Shoulder strap fixation of LUCAS-2 to facilitate continuous CPR during non-supine (stair) stretcher transport of OHCAs patients
- PMID: 33972647
- PMCID: PMC8110788
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89291-4
Shoulder strap fixation of LUCAS-2 to facilitate continuous CPR during non-supine (stair) stretcher transport of OHCAs patients
Abstract
Early recognition and rapid initiation of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are key to maximising chances of achieving successful return of spontaneous circulation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs), as well as improving patient outcomes both inside and outside hospital. Mechanical chest compression devices such as the LUCAS-2 have been developed to assist rescuers in providing consistent, high-quality compressions, even during transportation. However, providing uninterrupted and effective compressions with LUCAS-2 during transportation down stairwells and in tight spaces in a non-supine position is relatively impossible. In this study, we proposed adaptations to the LUCAS-2 to allow its use during transportation down stairwells and examined its effectiveness in providing high-quality CPR to simulated OHCA patients. 20 volunteer emergency medical technicians were randomised into 10 pairs, each undergoing 2 simulation runs per experimental arm (LUCAS-2 versus control) with a loaded Resusci Anne First Aid full body manikin weighing 60 kg. Quality of CPR compressions performed was measured using the CPRmeter placed on the sternum of the manikin. The respective times taken for each phase of the simulation protocol were recorded. Fisher's exact tests were used to analyse categorical variables and median test to analyse continuous variables. The LUCAS-2 group required a longer time (~ 35 s) to prepare the patient prior to transport (p < 0.0001) and arrive at the ambulance (p < 0.0001) compared to the control group. The CPR quality in terms of depth and rate for the overall resuscitation period did not differ significantly between the LUCAS-2 group and control group, though there was a reduction in both parameters when evaluating the device's automated compressions during transport. Nevertheless, the application of the LUCAS-2 device yielded a significantly higher chest compression fraction of 0.76 (p < 0.0001). Our novel adaptations to the LUCAS-2 device allow for uninterrupted compressions in patients being transported down stairwells, thus yielding better chest compression fractions for the overall resuscitation period. Whether potentially improved post-OHCA survival rates may be achieved requires confirmation in a real-world scenario study.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):437-445. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.1.32575. Epub 2017 Mar 14. West J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28435494 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Chest Compression Fraction between Mechanical Compressions on a Reducible Stretcher and Manual Compressions on a Standard Stretcher during Transport in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The Ambulance Stretcher Innovation of Asian Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ASIA-CPR) Pilot Trial.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):636-644. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1317892. Epub 2017 May 3. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017. PMID: 28467138 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality between mechanical compression on reducible stretcher versus manual compression on standard stretcher in small elevator.Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug;34(8):1604-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.072. Epub 2016 May 29. Am J Emerg Med. 2016. PMID: 27318749 Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):CD007260. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007260.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30125048 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical chest compression with LUCAS device does not improve clinical outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(44):e17550. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017550. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31689757 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in "hostile" environments: Using automated compression devices to minimize the rescuers' danger.World J Cardiol. 2023 Feb 26;15(2):45-55. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i2.45. World J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36911750 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shock Index Is a Validated Prediction Tool for the Short-Term Survival of Advanced Cancer Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department.J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 10;12(6):954. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060954. J Pers Med. 2022. PMID: 35743739 Free PMC article.
-
Early prehospital mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation use for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study.BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01115-6. BMC Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39427139 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac Arrest Occurring in High-Rise Buildings: A Scoping Review.J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 13;10(20):4684. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204684. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34682806 Free PMC article.
-
What are ambulance crews' experiences of using a mechanical chest compression device for out-of-hospital resuscitation? A constructivist qualitative study utilising online focus groups.Br Paramed J. 2022 Sep 1;7(2):24-30. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.24. Br Paramed J. 2022. PMID: 36451709 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical