Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
- PMID: 33973060
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03111-x
Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate image quality, image noise, and conspicuity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in pancreatic low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reconstructed using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and compare with those of images reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).
Methods: Our institutional review board approved this prospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with PDAC undergoing chemotherapy (14 men and 14 women; mean age, 68.4 years) underwent pancreatic LDCT for therapy evaluation. The LDCT images were reconstructed using 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (hybrid-IR) and DLIR at medium and high levels (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). The image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and conspicuity of PDAC were qualitatively assessed using a 5-point scale. CT numbers of the abdominal aorta, portal vein, pancreas, PDAC, background noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the anatomical structures, and tumor-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between the hybrid-IR, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H images.
Results: CT dose-index volumes and dose-length product in pancreatic LDCT were 2.3 ± 1.0 mGy and 74.9 ± 37.0 mGy•cm, respectively. The image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and conspicuity of PDAC were significantly better in DLIR-H than those in hybrid-IR and DLIR-M (all P < 0.001). The background noise was significantly lower in the DLIR-H images (P < 0.001) and resulted in improved SNRs (P < 0.001) and CNR (P < 0.001) compared with those in the hybrid-IR and DLIR-M images.
Conclusion: DLIR significantly reduced image noise and improved image quality in pancreatic LDCT images compared with hybrid-IR.
Keywords: Deep learning; Image processing; Multidetector computed tomography; Pancreas.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for pancreatic protocol dual-energy computed tomography: image quality and quantification of iodine concentration.Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):384-394. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08121-3. Epub 2021 Jun 15. Eur Radiol. 2022. PMID: 34131785
-
Deep-learning image reconstruction for 80-kVp pancreatic CT protocol: Comparison of image quality and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma visibility with hybrid-iterative reconstruction.Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110960. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110960. Epub 2023 Jul 4. Eur J Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37423016
-
Low-dose whole-body CT using deep learning image reconstruction: image quality and lesion detection.Br J Radiol. 2021 May 1;94(1121):20201329. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201329. Epub 2021 Feb 22. Br J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33571010 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for reducing radiation dose and image noise compared to iterative reconstruction and filtered back projection for head and chest computed tomography examinations: a systematic review.F1000Res. 2024 Apr 15;13:274. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.147345.1. eCollection 2024. F1000Res. 2024. PMID: 38725640 Free PMC article.
-
Deep Learning CT Image Reconstruction in Clinical Practice.Rofo. 2021 Mar;193(3):252-261. doi: 10.1055/a-1248-2556. Epub 2020 Dec 10. Rofo. 2021. PMID: 33302311 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Image Analysis: A Review.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jul 22;24(14):4749. doi: 10.3390/s24144749. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39066145 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of a reduced iodine load with deep learning reconstruction on abdominal MDCT.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 1;102(35):e34579. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034579. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37657067 Free PMC article.
-
Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 May;12(5):2977-2984. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1216. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022. PMID: 35502368 Free PMC article.
-
Image Quality and Lesion Detectability of Lower-Dose Abdominopelvic CT Obtained Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.Korean J Radiol. 2022 Apr;23(4):402-412. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0683. Epub 2022 Jan 27. Korean J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 35289146 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of SR-DLR in low-dose abdominal CT: superior image quality and noise reduction.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May;50(5):2321-2332. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04686-x. Epub 2024 Nov 19. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025. PMID: 39560744
References
-
- NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 3. (2019) https://www.nccnorg/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreaticpdf
-
- Klauss M, Schobinger M, Wolf I et al (2009) Value of three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic carcinoma using multidetector CT: initial results. World J Gastroenterol 15:5827-5832 - DOI
-
- Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1991) Ann ICRP 21:1-201
-
- Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL (2017) U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. Radiology 284:120-133 - DOI
-
- Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T et al (2019) Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 29:6163-6171 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources