Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
- PMID: 33973060
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03111-x
Deep learning image reconstruction for pancreatic low-dose computed tomography: comparison with hybrid iterative reconstruction
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate image quality, image noise, and conspicuity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in pancreatic low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reconstructed using deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and compare with those of images reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).
Methods: Our institutional review board approved this prospective study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with PDAC undergoing chemotherapy (14 men and 14 women; mean age, 68.4 years) underwent pancreatic LDCT for therapy evaluation. The LDCT images were reconstructed using 40% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (hybrid-IR) and DLIR at medium and high levels (DLIR-M and DLIR-H). The image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and conspicuity of PDAC were qualitatively assessed using a 5-point scale. CT numbers of the abdominal aorta, portal vein, pancreas, PDAC, background noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the anatomical structures, and tumor-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Qualitative and quantitative parameters were compared between the hybrid-IR, DLIR-M, and DLIR-H images.
Results: CT dose-index volumes and dose-length product in pancreatic LDCT were 2.3 ± 1.0 mGy and 74.9 ± 37.0 mGy•cm, respectively. The image noise, diagnostic acceptability, and conspicuity of PDAC were significantly better in DLIR-H than those in hybrid-IR and DLIR-M (all P < 0.001). The background noise was significantly lower in the DLIR-H images (P < 0.001) and resulted in improved SNRs (P < 0.001) and CNR (P < 0.001) compared with those in the hybrid-IR and DLIR-M images.
Conclusion: DLIR significantly reduced image noise and improved image quality in pancreatic LDCT images compared with hybrid-IR.
Keywords: Deep learning; Image processing; Multidetector computed tomography; Pancreas.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 3. (2019) https://www.nccnorg/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/pancreaticpdf
-
- Klauss M, Schobinger M, Wolf I et al (2009) Value of three-dimensional reconstructions in pancreatic carcinoma using multidetector CT: initial results. World J Gastroenterol 15:5827-5832 - DOI
-
- Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. (1991) Ann ICRP 21:1-201
-
- Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL (2017) U.S. Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Doses for 10 Adult CT Examinations. Radiology 284:120-133 - DOI
-
- Akagi M, Nakamura Y, Higaki T et al (2019) Deep learning reconstruction improves image quality of abdominal ultra-high-resolution CT. Eur Radiol 29:6163-6171 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
