Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33973331
- DOI: 10.1111/bju.15316
Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of studies investigating the role of primary Gleason grade (PGG), Gleason score (GS) or Gleason grade group (GGG) at positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) and oncological outcomes.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between 2005 and 2019 were included. The quality of the studies selected was assessed, and a protocol was registered and published in advance (PROSPERO: CRD42019131800). The primary outcome measure was BCR. Secondary outcome measures included cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and overall mortality during the follow-up period.
Results: Our systematic search yielded 3116 unique results. Ten studies were selected for meta-analysis. The sample sizes of PSM cohorts varied from 200 to 956, while the median follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 13 years. Most studies used BCR as a surrogate marker for disease progression; only two studies reported other oncological outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed in selected groups (PGG, GS and GGG). PGG 4 or 5 at the PSM was found to be predictive of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-2.02; P < 0.01). GGG > 1 at margin was also predictive of BCR compared to GGG 1 (GGG 1 vs 2: HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.6 -3.46; P < 0.001; GGG 1 vs 3: HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.82-8.57; P = 0.005; GGG 1 vs 4: HR 7.17, 95% CI 1.76-29.17; P = 0.006; and GGG 1 vs 5: HR 12.37, 95% CI 1.80-84.82; P = 0.01).
Conclusion: Gleason score, PGG and GGG at the PSM are associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. Longer-term studies are needed to investigate the utility of PGG, GS or GGG at the PSM in their ability to predict not only BCR but other outcomes such as cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival.
Keywords: #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; #uroonc; Gleason; Gleason grade group; biochemical recurrence; positive surgical margin; prostate cancer; prostatectomy.
© 2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review.BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 24;10(3):e034612. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034612. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32209629 Free PMC article.
-
The impact of positive surgical margin parameters and pathological stage on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jul 11;19(7):e0301653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301653. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38990870 Free PMC article.
-
Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19. Eur Urol. 2014. PMID: 25052213
-
Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11371.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22788795 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic Value of Gleason Score at Positive Surgical Margin in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Oct;18(5):e517-e522. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 Mar 4. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020. PMID: 32229268
Cited by
-
Evaluating the effect of histopathological parameters of prostate adenocarcinoma on prognosis in radical prostatectomy specimens.Ann Saudi Med. 2024 Jul-Aug;44(4):234-248. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2024.234. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Ann Saudi Med. 2024. PMID: 39127900 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of surgical margin status and location after radical prostatectomy using positive biopsy sites on 12-core standard prostate biopsy.Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):4066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08022-5. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35260742 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic values of the core components of the mammalian circadian clock in prostate cancer.PeerJ. 2021 Dec 9;9:e12539. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12539. eCollection 2021. PeerJ. 2021. PMID: 34966582 Free PMC article.
-
Fluorescence confocal microscopy for margin assessment in prostatectomy: IP8-FLUORESCE study protocol.BJU Int. 2025 Mar;135(3):502-509. doi: 10.1111/bju.16588. Epub 2024 Nov 16. BJU Int. 2025. PMID: 39548928 Free PMC article.
-
Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023 Dec;26(4):673-680. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6. Epub 2023 Mar 1. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2023. PMID: 36859711 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP et al. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1794-800
-
- Viers BR, Sukov WR, Gettman MT et al. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 1116-24
-
- Boorjian SA, Tollefson MK, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Karnes RJ. Clinicopathological predictors of systemic progression and prostate cancer mortality in patients with a positive surgical margin at radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prost Dis. 2012; 15: 56-62
-
- Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ et al. Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality. BJU Int 2012; 110: 1684-9
-
- Mauermann J, Fradet V, Lacombe L et al. The impact of solitary and multiple positive surgical margins on hard clinical end points in 1712 adjuvant treatment-naive pT2-4 N0 radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 19-25
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous