Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Oct;74(10):1649-1658.
doi: 10.1002/acr.24619. Epub 2022 Jun 30.

Identifying Potential Classification Criteria for Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease: Item Generation and Item Reduction

Affiliations
Review

Identifying Potential Classification Criteria for Calcium Pyrophosphate Deposition Disease: Item Generation and Item Reduction

Sara K Tedeschi et al. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Classification criteria for calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease will facilitate clinical research on this common crystalline arthritis. Our objective was to report on the first 2 phases of a 4-phase process for developing CPPD classification criteria.

Methods: CPPD classification criteria development is overseen by a 12-member steering committee. Item generation (phase I) included a scoping literature review of 5 literature databases and contributions from a 35-member combined expert committee and 2 patient research partners. Item reduction and refinement (phase II) involved a combined expert committee meeting, discussions among clinical, imaging, and laboratory advisory groups, and an item-rating exercise to assess the influence of individual items toward classification. The steering committee reviewed the modal rating score for each item (range -3 [strongly pushes away from CPPD] to +3 [strongly pushes toward CPPD]) to determine items to retain for future phases of criteria development.

Results: Item generation yielded 420 items (312 from the literature, 108 from experts/patients). The advisory groups eliminated items that they agreed were unlikely to distinguish between CPPD and other forms of arthritis, yielding 127 items for the item-rating exercise. Fifty-six items, most of which had a modal rating of +/- 2 or 3, were retained for future phases. As numerous imaging items were rated +3, the steering committee recommended focusing on imaging of the knee and wrist and 1 additional affected joint for calcification suggestive of CPP crystal deposition.

Conclusion: A data- and expert-driven process is underway to develop CPPD classification criteria. Candidate items comprise clinical, imaging, and laboratory features.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of classification criteria development process, with a focus on sub-processes in Phases I and II.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
PRISMA flow diagram for scoping literature review for CPPD.

References

    1. Abhishek A, Neogi T, Choi H, et al. Review: Unmet needs and the path forward in joint disease associated with calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition. Arthritis Rheumatol 2018;70:1182–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang W, Doherty M, Bardin T, et al. European league against rheumatism recommendations for calcium pyrophosphate deposition. Part i: Terminology and diagnosis. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:563–70. - PubMed
    1. Ramonda R, Musacchio E, Perissinotto E, et al. Prevalence of chondrocalcinosis in italian subjects from northeastern italy. The prova study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009;27:981–84. - PubMed
    1. Maravic M, Ea HK. Hospital burden of gout, pseudogout and other crystal arthropathies in france. Joint Bone Spine 2015;82:326–9. - PubMed
    1. Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Naimark A, et al. The prevalence of chondrocalcinosis in the elderly and its association with knee osteoarthritis: The framingham study. J Rheumatol 1989;16:1241–5. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances