Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery
- PMID: 33973847
- PMCID: PMC8112232
- DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021029
Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in spinal surgery
Abstract
Study design: Complete audit cycle.
Introduction: To highlight the unjustified overuse of perioperative antibiotics in clean non-instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries. To convince orthopedic surgeons in a methodological way of local field comparison between common practice on the use of perioperative antibiotics prophylaxis (PAP) in clean non-instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries and the ideal practice according to "The guidelines published by North American Spine Society (NASS)".
Methods: A complete audit cycle had been done. One hundred and eight patients underwent clean non-instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries in a tertiary spine center, during the period from the 1st of April to the 31st of June 2017 (primary audit period) and during the period from the 8th of May to the 21st of November 2018 (re-audit period). Group I: audit group (n = 54) was given the usual regimen (IV first-generation cephalosporin for 1-6 days, followed by oral antibiotics, till the removal of stitches) and Group II: re-audit group (n = 54) received only the IV antibiotics for one day). The study protocol was approved by our institution's Ethical Committee (17100582).
Results: This study showed a wide gap between international standards and local prescribing practices and calls for multiple interventions to improve our practice. Out of the 108 patients, only one case (1.85%) developed surgical site infection (SSI) in the audit group (Group I). The difference in infection rates between the two groups was statistically insignificant.
Conclusion: A single-day postoperative dose of antibiotics effectively prevents postoperative wound infection following non-instrumented lumbar spinal surgery and is not associated with a higher infection rate.
Keywords: Antibiotic prophylaxis; Clinical audit; First-generation cephalosporin; Lumbar spinal surgeries; Surgical site infection.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2021.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effective prevention of surgical site infection using a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guideline-based antimicrobial prophylaxis in lumbar spine surgery.J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Apr;6(4):327-9. doi: 10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.7. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007. PMID: 17436921
-
The Importance of Perioperative Prophylaxis with Cefuroxime or Ceftriaxone in the Surgical Site Infections Prevention after Cranial and Spinal Neurosurgical Procedures.Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2017 Sep 1;38(2):85-97. doi: 10.1515/prilozi-2017-0026. Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki). 2017. PMID: 28991759 Clinical Trial.
-
Intrawound application of vancomycin for prophylaxis in instrumented thoracolumbar fusions: efficacy, drug levels, and patient outcomes.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2084-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ff2cb1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011. PMID: 21304438
-
Surgical site infection in lumbar surgeries, pre and postoperative antibiotics and length of stay: a case study.J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009 Jul-Sep;21(3):135-8. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2009. PMID: 20929032
-
Perioperative Prophylactic Antibiotics in 1,250 Orbital Surgeries.Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul/Aug;36(4):385-389. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000001565. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 31917766
Cited by
-
Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Instrumented Lumbar Spine Surgery: Cefazolin Outperforms Clindamycin Regardless of Duration.Antibiotics (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;14(8):830. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14080830. Antibiotics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40868024 Free PMC article.
-
No more tears from surgical site infections in interventional pain management.Korean J Pain. 2023 Jan 1;36(1):11-50. doi: 10.3344/kjp.22397. Korean J Pain. 2023. PMID: 36581597 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Surgical Site Infection After Instrumented Spine Surgery in Patients With High Risk of Infection According to Different Antibiotic Prophylaxis Protocols: A Cohort Study of 132 Patients With a Minimum Follow-Up of 1 year.Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):1890-1894. doi: 10.1177/21925682241270097. Epub 2024 Aug 1. Global Spine J. 2025. PMID: 39089872 Free PMC article.
-
Is the routine use of systemic antibiotics after spine surgery warranted? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2022 Oct;31(10):2481-2492. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07294-9. Epub 2022 Jul 4. Eur Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35786772
-
Interventional Therapy and Surgical Management of Lumbar Disc Herniation in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023 Nov 22;15:88931. doi: 10.52965/001c.88931. eCollection 2023. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2023. PMID: 38025825 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hampson F, Ridgway E (2005) Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery. Surg-Oxford Int Ed 23(8), 290–293.
-
- Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR, Committee HICPA (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 20(4), 247–280. - PubMed
-
- Dobzyniak MA, Fischgrund JS, Hankins S, Herkowitz HN (2003) Single versus multiple dose antibiotic prophylaxis in lumbar disc surgery. Spine 28(21), E453–E455. - PubMed
-
- Boston KM, Baraniuk S, O’heron S, Murray KO (2009) Risk factors for spinal surgical site infection, Houston, Texas. Infect Cont Hosp Epidemiol 30(9), 884–889. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous