Challenges in management of the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1
- PMID: 33973907
- DOI: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000774
Challenges in management of the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1
Abstract
Purpose of review: The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 was pioneered by Claes Dohlman several decades ago. Since its inception, the device has undergone multiple revisions to address challenges associated with retroprosthetic membrane formation, retention, extrusion, stromal melt and endophthalmitis. Although visual outcomes and retention rates have improved, challenges, especially glaucoma, remain.
Recent findings: The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I device has seen an increase in popularity because of the improvement in rates of retention and visual rehabilitation. Recent outcome studies have allowed clinicians to identify diagnoses and indications that can lead to more favorable results with the Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I device.
Summary: The Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I device continues to play a vital role in visual rehabilitation for eyes with very low chance of realistic allograft survival -- such as in eyes where corneal grafting is considered high-risk: eyes with corneal limbal stem cell failure, extensive deep corneal stromal neovascularization, and multiple allograft failures. This review article summarizes the perioperative and postoperative challenges, as well as other considerations associated with the device.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The Boston keratoprosthesis in the management of corneal limbal stem cell deficiency.Cornea. 2011 Nov;30(11):1187-94. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182114467. Cornea. 2011. PMID: 21885964
-
The Boston type I keratoprosthesis: improving outcomes and expanding indications.Ophthalmology. 2009 Apr;116(4):640-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.12.058. Epub 2009 Feb 25. Ophthalmology. 2009. PMID: 19243830
-
Longer-term vision outcomes and complications with the Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis at the University of California, Davis.Ophthalmology. 2011 Aug;118(8):1543-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.032. Epub 2011 Mar 12. Ophthalmology. 2011. PMID: 21397948
-
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Medium- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis.Cornea. 2019 Nov;38(11):1465-1473. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002098. Cornea. 2019. PMID: 31403526
-
The Boston Keratoprosthesis-The First 50 Years: Some Reminiscences.Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2022 Sep 15;8:1-32. doi: 10.1146/annurev-vision-100820-021253. Epub 2022 Jul 14. Annu Rev Vis Sci. 2022. PMID: 35834821 Review.
Cited by
-
Successful use of conjunctival flaps to prolong survival of type I keratoprosthesis in severe bilateral chemical burns: two case reports.F1000Res. 2023 May 19;12:521. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.131492.1. eCollection 2023. F1000Res. 2023. PMID: 37920455 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of the relevant factors for corneal graft rejection in the southern Liaoning region from 2019 to 2023.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 8;11:1517198. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1517198. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 39845815 Free PMC article.
-
Ultra-wide field imaging to assess the optic nerve and retina in Boston type I and II keratoprosthesis patients.Eye Vis (Lond). 2022 May 7;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00289-z. Eye Vis (Lond). 2022. PMID: 35526055 Free PMC article.
-
Reconstruction of deep and perforating corneal defects in dogs-A review (Part II/III): Biomaterials and keratoprosthesis.Vet Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;28(2):532-542. doi: 10.1111/vop.13287. Epub 2024 Oct 2. Vet Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39358916 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ciolino JB, Belin MW, Todani A, et al. Boston Keratoprosthesis Type 1 Study Group. Retention of the Boston keratoprosthesis type 1: multicenter study results. Ophthalmology 2013; 120:1195–1200.
-
- Zerbe BL, Belin MW, Ciolino JB. Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study Group. Results from the multicenter Boston Type 1 Keratoprosthesis Study. Ophthalmology 2006; 113:1779.e1–1784.e7.
-
- Lam FC, Liu C. The future of keratoprostheses. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95:304–305.
-
- Ahmad S, Mathews PM, Lindsley K, et al. Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis versus repeat donor keratoplasty for corneal graft failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2016; 123:165–177.
-
- Chhadva P, Cortina MS. Long-term outcomes of permanent keratoprosthesis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2019; 30:243–248.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials