Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;59(6):487-494.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001525.

Payment Discrepancies and Access to Primary Care Physicians for Dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid Beneficiaries

Affiliations

Payment Discrepancies and Access to Primary Care Physicians for Dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid Beneficiaries

Vicki Fung et al. Med Care. .

Abstract

Background: Physicians often receive lower payments for dual-eligible Medicare-Medicaid beneficiaries versus nondual Medicare beneficiaries because of state reimbursement caps. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) primary care fee bump temporarily eliminated this differential in 2013-2014.

Objective: To examine how dual payment policy impacts primary care physicians' (PCP) acceptance of duals.

Research design: We assessed differences in the likelihood that PCPs had dual caseloads of ≥10% or 20% in states with lower versus full dual reimbursement using linear probability models adjusted for physician and area-level traits. Using a triple-difference approach, we examined changes in dual caseloads for PCPs versus a control group of specialists in states with fee bumps versus no change during years postbump versus prebump.

Subjects: PCPs and specialists (cardiologists, orthopedic surgeons, general surgeons) that billed fee-for-service Medicare.

Measures: State dual payment policies and physicians' dual caseloads as a percentage of their Medicare patients.

Results: In 2012, 81% of PCPs had dual caseloads of ≥10% and this was less likely among PCPs in states with lower versus full dual reimbursement (eg, difference=-4.52 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -6.80 to -2.25). The proportion of PCPs with dual caseloads of ≥10% or 20% decreased significantly between 2012 and 2017 and the fee bump was not consistently associated with increases in dual caseloads.

Conclusions: Pre-ACA, PCPs' participation in the dual program appeared to be lower in states with lower reimbursement for duals. Despite the ACA fee bump, dual caseloads declined over time, raising concerns of worsening access to care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.P.N. discloses that he was a director of Aetna until May 2018, held Aetna stock until November 2018, and currently owns stock in Novartis and Medtronic. There are no other relevant disclosures. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of Physicians that Billed Medicare Overall and Per 1,000 Traditional Medicare Beneficiaries by Specialty. Note: Solid lines represent the total number of physicians in each group who billed Medicare per year for more than 10 unique beneficiaries; dotted lines represent the number of physicians who billed Medicare per year per 1,000 TM Medicare beneficiaries.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Adjusted Percentage of PCPs and Specialists with Dual Caseloads of at least 10%: 2012–2017
Note: Percentages adjusted for provider gender, year of medical school graduation, number of hospital affiliations, practice size, subspecialty, TM panel size quartile, MA penetration by county, percent of Medicare enrollees in county who are duals, metro vs. non-metro county, state Medicaid expansion, state dual demonstration program; SEs clustered by state; physicians with suppressed dual/non-dual data were assumed to have 10 duals.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Congressional Budget Office. Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries of Medicare and Medicaid: Characteristics, Health Care Spending, and Evolving Policies. June2013. Available at: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/113th-congress-2013-2014/reports....AccessedJuly 19, 2020.
    1. Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. Effects of Medicaid Coverage of Medicare Cost Sharing on Access to Care. March2015. Available at: https://www.macpac.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Effects-of-Medicaid-Co....AccessedJuly 19, 2020.
    1. Kaiser Familty Foundation. Medicaid-to-Medicare Fee Index. 2016. Available at: https://www.kff.org/medicaid/state-indicator/medicaid-to-medicare-fee-in....AccessedJuly 19, 2020.
    1. Berman S, Dolins J, Tang S-f, Yudkowsky B. Factors that influence the willingness of private primary care pediatricians to accept more Medicaid patients. Pediatrics 2002;110(2):239–248. - PubMed
    1. Zuckerman S, McFeeters J, Cunningham P, Nichols L. Changes in medicaid physician fees, 1998–2003: implications for physician participation. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:W4–374 – W4–384. - PubMed

Publication types