Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):1401-1412.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007977.

The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: A Versatile Option for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Affiliations

The Profunda Artery Perforator Flap: A Versatile Option for Head and Neck Reconstruction

Rene D Largo et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Although the profunda artery perforator flap has gained popularity in breast reconstruction, it has not been well described for reconstruction of head and neck defects. The authors report their experience with free profunda artery perforator flaps in postoncologic head and neck reconstruction.

Methods: A retrospective review of all free profunda artery perforator flaps used for head and neck reconstruction from 2016 to 2019 was performed.

Results: Overall, 61 profunda artery perforator flap reconstructions were performed: 45 single independent flaps, 12 in conjunction with a second free flap, and four in combination with two other free flaps. The profunda artery perforator flaps were most commonly used for reconstruction of the tongue (n = 19), cheek (n = 11), parotid (n = 10), and maxilla (n = 6). The profunda artery perforator flaps averaged 7.1 × 12.1 × 1.9 cm, with a mean pedicle length of 11.5 cm. The A, B, and C perforators were located at mean distances of 7.4 cm (range, 4 to 11.5 cm), 11.7 cm (range, 8 to 18 cm), and 16.1 cm (range, 14 to 20.5 cm) from the pubic tubercle along the axis of the adductor longus muscle and 7.9 cm (range, 7 to 11cm), 7.6 cm (range, 7 to 15.5 cm), and 7.2 cm (range, 6 to 16 cm) posterior and perpendicular to the axis. There were three partial flap losses. Eight patients (13 percent) had recipient-site complications necessitating operative intervention: four for vascular compromise of the profunda artery perforator flap, two for hematoma evacuation, and two for infection. Donor-site complications were noted in seven patients (11 percent), two of whom required operative intervention.

Conclusions: The profunda artery perforator flap is a versatile and reliable flap with consistent anatomy and a low complication rate. The profunda artery perforator flap seems to be a reasonable alternative for reconstruction of head and neck defects.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;32:32–38.
    1. Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: A new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:71–79.
    1. Lutz BS, Wei FC. Microsurgical workhorse flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32:421–430, vii.
    1. Wei FC, Jain V, Celik N, Chen HC, Chuang DC, Lin CH. Have we found an ideal soft-tissue flap? An experience with 672 anterolateral thigh flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2219–2226; discussion 2227–2230.
    1. Allen RJ, Haddock NT, Ahn CY, Sadeghi A. Breast reconstruction with the profunda artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:16e–23e.