Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;44(5):630-640.
doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00223-z. Epub 2021 May 11.

Profiles of partner health linked to a partner-focused intervention following patient initial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)

Affiliations

Profiles of partner health linked to a partner-focused intervention following patient initial implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)

Jonathan P Auld et al. J Behav Med. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

This study examined differential responses among partners who participated in a RCT designed to compare two social cognitive theory interventions, one designed for patients only (P-only) and one for patients and their intimate partners (P + P). The interventions were delivered following the patient receiving an initial ICD implant. Partner health outcomes were examined longitudinally from baseline at hospital discharge to 3, 6, and 12 months. Outcomes included 6 measures: partner physical and mental health status (Short-Form-36 PCS and MCS), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), caregiver burden (Oberst Caregiver Burden Scale), and self-efficacy in ICD management (Sudden Cardiac Arrest Self-efficacy scale). Growth mixture and mixed effect modeling were used to identify and compare trajectories of 6 health outcomes within the P-only and P + P arms of the study. Partners (n = 301) were on average 62 years old, female (74.1%) and Caucasian (83.4%), with few co-morbidities (mean Charlson Co-morbidity index, 0.72 ± 1.1). Two types of profiles were observed for P-only and P + P, one profile where patterns of health outcomes were generally better across 12 months and one with outcome patterns that were generally worse across time. For PCS, no significant partner differences were observed between P-only or P + P in either the better (p = 0.067) or the worse (p = 0.129) profile types. Compared to P-only, partners in the worse profile improved significantly over 12 months in MCS (p = 0.006), caregiver burden P + P (p = 0.004) and self-efficacy P + P (p = 0.041). Compared to P-only, P + P partners in the low anxiety profile improved significantly (p = 0.001) at 3 months. Partners with more psychosocial distress at hospital discharge benefited most from the P + P intervention. Among partners with generally low levels of anxiety, those in the P + P intervention compared to P-only showed greater improvement in anxiety over 12 months.

Keywords: Caregivers; Implantable cardioverter defibrilator; Outcomes; Randomized-controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest Jonathan P. Auld, Elaine A. Thompson and Cynthia M. Dougherty declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Partner consort
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Physical and mental health status trajectories over 12 months by the high and low subgroups
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Psychosocial outcome trajectories over 12 months by high and low subgroups

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, Bryant WJ, Callans DJ, Curtis AB, & Page RL (2018). 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society. Heart Rhythm, 15, e73–e189. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.036 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alcántara C, Edmondson D, Moise N, Oyola D, Hiti D, & Kronish IM (2014). Anxiety sensitivity and medication nonadherence in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 77, 283–286. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.07.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allemann H, Stromberg A, & Thylen I (2018). Perceived Social support in persons with heart failure living with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: A cross-sectional explorative study. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 33, E1–E8. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000523 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auld JP, Thompson EA, & Dougherty CM (2020). Social cognitive intervention following an initial implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Better treatment response for secondary vs. primary prevention. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology. 10.1111/pace.13929 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bakas T, Austin JK, Jessup SL, Williams LS, & Oberst MT (2004). Time and difficulty of tasks provided by family caregivers of stroke survivors. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 36, 95 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources