Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;16(1):1926052.
doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1926052.

Breaking the patientification process - through co-creation of care, using old arctic survival knowledge

Ulrika Sandén  1 , Lars Harrysson  2 , Hans Thulesius  3 , Fredrik Nilsson  1
Affiliations

Breaking the patientification process - through co-creation of care, using old arctic survival knowledge

Ulrika Sandén et al. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Cancer research and connected innovation processes often lack a major component; patient participation. We revisit three studies (a-c) in order to explore how Momentary contentment theory may be used to improve patient participation and psychosocial health.

Method: We revisited data from the initial (a) classic grounded theory study on Momentary contentment, based on four years of observation and 14 interviews. It explains a way of dealing with life close to death and morbidity. In the imminence of danger the studied culture resembles the context of cancer patients. The two following studies used focus group interviews with (b) 19 cancer patients and (c) 17 relatives of cancer patients in southern Sweden.

Results: We suggest a process where cancer patients are taught to be submissive and that the support they receive from health providers may be counterproductive to contentment; a patientification process. We present alternative ways for people to handle issues such as hope, waiting, knowledge gaps and healthcare navigation while living with cancer. We introduce an alternative to patientification and passive patients where active patients create their own safety and truly participates in their care.

Conclusions: We propose clinical studies to introduce such a shift from patentification to co-creation of care.

Keywords: Cancer; co-creation; design thinking; health; hope; identity; innovation; patient perspective; rehabilitation; waiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diamond of participatory decision-making
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patientification process
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Momentary contentment process
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Illustration of “Scanxiety”
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Overcoming Scanxiety
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agledahl, K. M., Gulbrandsen, P., Førde, R., & Wifstad, Å. (2011). Courteous but not curious: How doctors’ politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(11), 650–12. 10.1136/jme.2010.041988 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alden, D. L. (2014). Decision aid influences on factors associated with patient empowerment prior to cancer treatment decision making. Medical Decision Making, 34(7), 884–898. 10.1177/0272989X14536780 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. Jossey-Bass.
    1. Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion1. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11–18. 10.1093/heapro/11.1.11 - DOI
    1. Bandura, A. (1997). Insights Self-efficacy. Harvard Mental Health Letter, 13(9), 4–6.

LinkOut - more resources