Quality of Life-CI: Development of an Early Childhood Parent-Proxy and Adolescent Version
- PMID: 33974778
- PMCID: PMC8855668
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001004
Quality of Life-CI: Development of an Early Childhood Parent-Proxy and Adolescent Version
Abstract
Objectives: Severe to profound hearing loss is associated with communication, social, and behavioral difficulties that have been linked to worse health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to individuals with normal hearing. HRQoL has been identified as an important health outcome that measures functional ability, particularly for chronic conditions and disabilities. The current study developed the QoL-cochlear implant (CI) for early childhood and adolescents using the recommended Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidelines on patient-reported outcomes.
Design: Three phases of instrument development were conducted for both the early childhood (0 to 5 years old; parent proxy) and adolescent/young adult (13 to 22 years old) versions of the QoL-CI. Phase 1 included the development of our conceptual framework, which informed the discussion guides for stakeholder focus groups (e.g., audiologists, physicians, and therapists) at CI clinics in Miami and Philadelphia (n = 39). Open-ended interviews with parents (N = 18 for early childhood; N = 6 for adolescent/young adult version) and adolescents/young adults using CIs (n = 17) were then completed at both sites during phase 2. All interviews were transcribed and coded to identify common themes, which were then used to draft items for the QoL-CI. Both versions of the QoL-CI were developed using Qualtrics to allow for quick, easy electronic administration of the instruments on a tablet device. Last, phase 3 included cognitive testing in a new sample (N = 19 early childhood, N = 19 adolescent) to ensure that the draft instruments were clear, comprehensive, and easy to use.
Results: Participant responses obtained via the open-ended interviews yielded an early childhood and adolescent version of the QoL-CI that was reportedly easy to complete and comprehensive. The final QoL-CI Early Childhood instrument yielded 35 questions across eight functional domains (environmental sounds, communication, social functioning, behavior, CI device management and routines, school, CI benefits, and early intervention). Similarly, the final QoL-CI adolescent/young adult version consisted of 46 items across eight domains (noisy environments, communication, CI usage and management, advocacy, social functioning, emotional functioning, acceptance, and independence).
Conclusions: The QoL-CI is a condition-specific QoL instrument that can be used for children ages birth through 22 years. These instruments capture the "whole" child by not only focusing on communication and auditory skills but also academic, social and emotional functioning. Once validated, these CI-specific measures will enable providers to track long-term outcomes and evaluate the efficacy of new interventions to improve overall CI use and QoL for pediatric and young adult users.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Cejas is on the AG Bell Board of Directors and is a consultant for Advanced Bionics. Dr. Sanchez is a consultant for Advanced Bionics and is on the MED-EL bilingual task force. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Similar articles
-
Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments for Children With Cochlear Implants: Development of Child and Parent-Proxy Measures.Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):592-604. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000631. Ear Hear. 2019. PMID: 30059365 Free PMC article.
-
American parent perspectives on quality of life in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):269-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000108. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25377531
-
Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia: First Health-related Quality-of-Life Measures for Pediatric Patients.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Oct;13(10):1726-1735. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201603-198OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016. PMID: 27464304 Free PMC article.
-
Quality-of-life measures in chronic diseases of childhood.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(4):1-157. doi: 10.3310/hta5040. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11262421 Review.
-
Integrative review and evaluation of quality of life related instruments in pediatric urology.J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Aug;17(4):443.e1-443.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Mar 20. J Pediatr Urol. 2021. PMID: 33832872 Review.
Cited by
-
Parent-reported quality of life in children with cochlear implants differs across countries.Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 6;13:966401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.966401. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 36275275 Free PMC article.
-
A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):879-892. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5. Epub 2024 Nov 23. Qual Life Res. 2025. PMID: 39579270 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implant-specific risks should be considered, when assessing the quality of life of children and adolescents with hearing loss and cochlear implants-not just cochlear implant-specific benefits-Perspective.Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 8;16:985230. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.985230. eCollection 2022. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36425475 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Patients on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Otol Neurotol Open. 2025 Apr 17;5(2):e068. doi: 10.1097/ONO.0000000000000068. eCollection 2025 Jun. Otol Neurotol Open. 2025. PMID: 40599816 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System.Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.30381. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 36082873 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Archbold SM, Lutman ME, Gregory S, O’Neill C, & Nikolopoulos TP (2002). Parents and their deaf child: Their perceptions three year period. Deafness & Education International, 4(1), 12–40. doi: 10.1179/146431502790560962. - DOI
-
- Cejas I, Quittner AL (2018). Effects of Family Variables on Spoken Language in Children with Cochlear Implants. In Knoors H, Marschark M (Eds). Evidence-Based Practices in Deaf Education (pp. 111–128). Oxford University Press.
-
- Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2020, June 15). National Center for Health Statistics: Healthy People 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/healthy_people/hp2020.htm
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical