Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep/Oct;42(5):1195-1207.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001038.

Audiologic Profiles of Children With Otitis Media With Effusion

Affiliations

Audiologic Profiles of Children With Otitis Media With Effusion

Sarah Al-Salim et al. Ear Hear. 2021 Sep/Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the impact of effusion volume, viscosity, and purulence on the audiologic profiles of children with otitis media with effusion.

Design: Fifty-one ears from children between the ages of 8 months and 11 years who had a diagnosis of otitis media with effusion and were scheduled for tympanostomy tube placement were recruited from medical clinics. The control group consisted of 17 ears from children between the ages of 10 months and 11 years without a recent history of otitis media and were recruited from a database of research volunteers. Participants received a comprehensive audiologic testing battery consisting of tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions, behavioral audiometric thresholds, and auditory brainstem response testing. For children with otitis media, this testing battery occurred 1 to 2 days before surgery. Middle ear effusions were characterized and collected on the day of surgery during tympanostomy tube placement from ears with otitis media with effusion. The comprehensive audiologic testing battery was completed postoperatively as well for most participants.

Results: Effusion volume, categorized in each ear as clear, partial, or full, effected the audiologic results. Ears with full effusions had moderate hearing losses, few to no measurable otoacoustic emissions, and delayed Wave V latencies. Ears with partial effusions and clear ears both had slight to mild hearing losses and normal Wave V latencies, though ears with partial effusions had fewer measurable otoacoustic emissions than clear ears. Normal-hearing control ears with no recent history of otitis media with effusion demonstrated normal audiometric thresholds, present otoacoustic emissions, and normal Wave V latencies. Repeat postoperative testing demonstrated improvements in audiologic testing results for all of the otitis media with effusion volume groups, with no significant differences remaining between the three otitis media with effusion groups. However, significant differences between otitis media with effusion ears and normal-hearing control ears persisted postoperatively, with otitis media with effusion ears demonstrating significantly poorer audiometric thresholds and reduced otoacoustic emissions as compared to normal control ears. The effect of effusion viscosity and purulence could not be systematically evaluated because minimal variability in effusion viscosity and purulence was observed in our sample, with nearly all effusions being mucoid and nonpurulent.

Conclusions: Effusion volume observed at the time of tympanostomy tube surgery was found to play a significant role in outcomes and responses on a range of audiologic tests that compose the standard clinical pediatric audiologic assessment battery. Full middle ear effusions were associated with a moderate hearing loss, and few to no measurable otoacoustic emissions were detected. Ears with a recent diagnosis of otitis media with effusion but clear at the time of tympanostomy tube placement had less hearing loss and a greater number of present otoacoustic emissions than ears with full or partial effusions but were still found to have poorer hearing sensitivity than the healthy control ears. Differences between ears with otitis media with effusion and healthy control ears persisted on postoperative assessments of otoacoustic emissions and audiometric thresholds, though there were no remaining effects of the presurgical effusion volume group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percent of DPOAEs present at each frequency within each volume group. DPOAE = distortion product otoacoustic emission.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The top panel plots DPOAE level and noise level at each frequency based on volume of effusion present in middle ears. Solid lines indicate DPOAE level and dashed lines indicate noise level. The bottom panel plots DPOAE SNR at each frequency based on volume of effusion present. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisks indicate lack of a significant difference between effusion volume groups. DPOAE = distortion product otoacoustic emission; SNR = signal to noise ratio.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percent of TEOAEs present at each frequency based on volume of effusion present in middle ears with OME. TEOAE = transient evoked otoacoustic emission.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
The top panel plots TEOAE level and noise level at each frequency based on volume of effusion present in middle ears. Solid lines indicate TEOAE level and dashed lines indicate noise level. The bottom panel plots TEOAE SNR at each frequency based on volume of effusion present. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Asterisks indicate lack of a significant difference between effusion volume groups. TEOAE = transient evoked otoacoustic emission; SNR = signal to noise ratio.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Average audiograms for ears with OME grouped by volume of effusion. Error bars represent standard error at each frequency. A complete behavioral audiogram (6 frequencies, 250–8000 Hz) could not be obtained for all participants so results include some incomplete audiograms (3 or 4 frequencies, 500–4000 Hz). Of the audiograms included in the figure, 2 of the healthy group, 4 of the ears clear of effusion, 3 of the partial group, and 3 of the full group were incomplete audiograms. Symbols are slightly offset to aid in visualization.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Average post-operative audiograms for ears with OME grouped by volume of effusion present in ears at surgery. Error bars represent standard error at each frequency. A complete behavioral audiogram (6 frequencies, 250–8000 Hz) could not be obtained for all participants so results include some incomplete audiograms (3 or 4 frequencies, 500–4000 Hz). Of the audiograms included in the figure, 2 of the ears clear of an effusion, 2 of the partial group, and 2 of the full group were incomplete audiograms. Symbols are slightly offset to aid in visualization.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
The top panel plots post-operative DPOAE level and noise level at each frequency based on volume of effusion present in middle ears at the time of surgery. Solid lines indicate DPOAE level and dashed lines indicate noise level. The bottom panel plots DPOAE SNR at each frequency based on volume of effusion that was present in ears at surgery. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Symbols are slightly offset to aid in visualization. DPOAE = distortion product otoacoustic emission; SNR = signal to noise ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akinpelu OV, Funnell WRJ, & Daniel SJ (2015). Detection of otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla when the middle ear contains amniotic fluid. Laryngoscope, 125(4), E138–E142. 10.1002/lary.24914 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alaerts J, Luts H, & Wouters J (2007). Evaluation of middle ear function in young children. Otology & Neurotology, 28(6), 727–732. 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3180dca1e5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amedee RG (1995). The effects of chronic otitis media with effusion on the measurement of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. The Laryngoscope, 105(6), 589–595. 10.1288/00005537-199506000-00006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Audiology. (2020). Clinical Guidance Document for the Assessment of Hearing in Infants and Young Children. Retrieved from https://www.audiology.org/sites/default/files/publications/resources/Cli...
    1. Anteby I, Hafner H, Pratt H, & Uri N (1986). Auditory brainstem evoked potentials in evaluating the central effects of middle ear effusion. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 12(1), 1–11. 10.1016/S0165-5876(86)80051-9 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types