Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul;27(7):981-986.
doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 8.

How to interpret and use COVID-19 serology and immunology tests

Affiliations
Review

How to interpret and use COVID-19 serology and immunology tests

David S Y Ong et al. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Although molecular tests are considered the reference standard for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) diagnostics, serological and immunological tests may be useful in specific settings.

Objectives: This review summarizes the underlying principles and performance of COVID-19 serological and immunological testing.

Sources: Selected peer-reviewed publications on COVID-19 related serology and immunology published between December 2019 and March 2021.

Content: Serological tests are highly specific but heterogeneous in their sensitivity for the diagnosis of COVID-19. For certain indications, including delayed disease presentations, serological tests can have added value. The presence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may indicate a recent or past COVID-19 infection. Lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) antibody tests have the advantages of being easy and fast to perform, but many have a low sensitivity in acute settings. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIAs) have higher sensitivities. Besides humoral immunity, cellular immunity is also essential for successful host defences against viruses. Enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays can be used to measure T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2. The presence of cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in never exposed patients suggests the possibility of cellular immunity induced by other circulating coronaviruses. T-cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 have also been detected in recovered COVID-19 patients with no detectable antibodies.

Implications: Serological and immunological tests are primarily applied for population-based seroprevalence studies to evaluate the effectiveness of COVID-19 control measures and increase our understanding of the immunology behind COVID-19. Combining molecular diagnostics with serological tests may optimize the detection of COVID-19. As not all infected patients will develop antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, assessment of cellular immunity may provide complementary information on whether a patient has been previously infected with COVID-19. More studies are needed to understand the correlations of these serological and immunological parameters with protective immunity, taking into account the different circulating virus variants.

Keywords: Antibodies; COVID-19; Immunity; SARS-CoV-2; Serology; T cell.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Antibody and T-cell responses over time after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Immune responses can be highly heterogenous depending on various factors including patient characteristics and severity of illness. The presented figure is a simplified representation to increase general understanding, but can be variable for different individuals in different settings.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Poland G.A., Ovsyannikova I.G., Kennedy R.B. SARS-CoV-2 immunity: review and applications to phase 3 vaccine candidates. Lancet. 2020;396:1595–1606. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ong D.S.Y., de Man S.J., Lindeboom F.A., Koeleman J.G.M. Comparison of diagnostic accuracies of rapid serological tests and ELISA to molecular diagnostics in patients with suspected coronavirus disease 2019 presenting to the hospital. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:1094.e7–1094.e10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long Q.-X., Liu B.-Z., Deng H.-J., Wu G.-C., Deng K., Chen Y.-K., et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26:845–848. - PubMed
    1. Gudbjartsson D.F., Norddahl G.L., Melsted P., Gunnarsdottir K., Holm H., Eythorsson E., et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1724–1734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Isho B., Abe K.T., Zuo M., Jamal A.J., Rathod B., Wang J.H., et al. Persistence of serum and saliva antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens in COVID-19 patients. Sci Immunol. 2020;5:abe5511. - PMC - PubMed

Substances