Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 1;59(Suppl 3):S270-S278.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001490.

Did Access to Care Improve Since Passage of the Veterans Choice Act?: Differences Between Rural and Urban Veterans

Deborah Gurewich  1   2 , Michael Shwartz  1   3 , Erin Beilstein-Wedel  1 , Heather Davila  1 , Amy K Rosen  1   2
Affiliations

Did Access to Care Improve Since Passage of the Veterans Choice Act?: Differences Between Rural and Urban Veterans

Deborah Gurewich et al. Med Care. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: The 2014 Veterans Choice Program aimed to improve care access for Veterans through expanded availability of community care (CC). Increased access to CC could particularly benefit rural Veterans, who often face obstacles in obtaining medical care at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). However, whether Veterans Choice Program improved timely access to care for this vulnerable population is understudied.

Objectives: To examine wait times among rural and urban Veterans for 5 outpatient specialty care services representing the top requests for CC services among rural Veterans.

Research design: Retrospective study using VHA and CC outpatient consult data from VHA's Corporate Data Warehouse in Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 (October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015) and FY2018 (October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018).

Subjects: All Veterans who received a new patient consult for physical therapy, cardiology, optometry, orthopedics, and/or dental services in VHA and/or CC.

Measures: Wait time, care setting (VHA/CC), rural/urban status, sociodemographics, and comorbidities.

Results: Our sample included 1,112,876 Veterans. Between FY2015 and FY2018, mean wait times decreased for all services for both rural and urban Veterans; declines were greatest in VHA (eg, mean optometry wait times for rural Veterans in VHA vs. CC declined 8.3 vs. 6.4 d, respectively, P<0.0001). By FY2018, for both rural and urban Veterans, CC mean wait times for most services were longer than VHA wait times.

Conclusions: Timely care access for all Veterans improved between FY15 and FY18, particularly in VHA. As expansion of CC continues under the MISSION Act, more research is needed to evaluate quality of care across VHA and CC and what role, if any, wait times play.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Kizer KW, Jha AK. Restoring trust in VA health care. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:295–297. - PubMed
    1. Chokshi DA. Improving health care for Veterans—a watershed moment for the VA. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:297–299. - PubMed
    1. Kilbourne AM, Elwy AR, Sales AE, et al. Accelerating research impact in a learning health care system: VA’s quality enhancement research initiative in the CHOICE Act era. Med Care. 2017;55(suppl 1):S4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Government Accountability Office. VA Health Care: estimating resources needed to provide community care. Report to Congressional Requestors. GAO-19-478. 2019. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-19-478. Accessed December 31, 2020.
    1. Hussey PS, Ringel JS, Ahluwalia S, et al. Resources and capabilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide timely and accessible care to Veterans. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2015. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1165z2.html. Accessed December 31, 2020. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms