Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;48(2):118-129.
doi: 10.1159/000509027. Epub 2020 Jul 23.

A Systematic Review of Interventions Used to Increase Blood Donor Compliance with Deferral Criteria

Julia C Cutts  1 , Brendan Quinn  1   2 , Clive R Seed  3 , George Kotsiou  3 , Ruth Pearson  1 , Nick Scott  1   2 , David P Wilson  1 , Mary Ellen Harrod  4 , Lisa Maher  1   5 , Sharon Caris  6 , Alex J Thompson  7 , Michael Farrell  8 , Joanne Pink  3 , Margaret E Hellard  1   2   9   10
Affiliations

A Systematic Review of Interventions Used to Increase Blood Donor Compliance with Deferral Criteria

Julia C Cutts et al. Transfus Med Hemother. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Pre-donation screening of potential blood donors is critical for ensuring the safety of the donor blood supply, and donor deferral as a result of risk factors is practised worldwide. This systematic review was conducted in the context of an expert review convened by the Australian Red Cross Lifeblood in 2013 to consider Lifeblood's injecting drug use (IDU)-related policies and aimed to identify studies assessing interventions to improve compliance with deferral criteria in blood donation settings.

Materials and methods: MEDLINE/PubMed, OVID Medline, OVID Embase, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL and DARE) databases were searched for studies conducted within blood donation settings that examined interventions to increase blood donor compliance with deferral criteria. Observational and experimental studies from all geographical areas were considered.

Results: Ten studies were identified that tested at least one intervention to improve blood donor compliance with deferral criteria, including computerized interviews or questionnaires, direct and indirect oral questioning, educational materials, and a combination of a tickbox questionnaire and a personal donor interview. High-quality evidence from a single study was provided for the effectiveness of a computerized interview in improving detection of HIV risk behaviour. Low-quality evidence for the effectiveness of computerized interviews was provided by 3 additional studies. Two studies reported a moderate effect of direct questioning in increasing donor deferral, but the quality of the evidence was low.

Conclusion: This review identified several interventions to improve donor compliance that have been tested in blood donation settings and provided evidence for the effectiveness of computerized interviews in improving detection of risk factors.

Keywords: Blood donors; Compliance; Deferral; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.E.H. and the Burnet Institute receive funding from Gilead Sciences, Abbvie, and GSK for investigator-initiated research. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of study identification.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pouget ER, Hagan H, Des Jarlais DC. Meta-analysis of hepatitis C seroconversion in relation to shared syringes and drug preparation equipment. Addiction. 2012 Jun;107((6)):1057–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasadeusz J, Locarnini S, Kidd M, Bradford D, Danta M. HIV, viral hepatitis and STIs: a guide for primary care. Australasian Society for HIV Medicine; 20081. HIV, HBV, HCV and STIs: similarities and differences; pp. pp. 9–27.
    1. Quinn B, Seed C, Keller A, Maher L, Wilson D, Farrelle M, et al. Re-examining blood donor deferral criteria relating to injecting drug use. Int J Drug Policy. 2017 Oct;48:9–17. - PubMed
    1. Quinn B, Pearson R, Cutts J, Seed C, Scott N, Hoad V, et al. Blood donation amongst people who inject drugs in Australia: research supporting policy change. Vox Sang. 2020 Apr;115((3)):162–70. - PubMed
    1. Lucky TT, Seed CR, Waller D, Lee JF, McDonald A, Wand H, et al. Understanding noncompliance with selective donor deferral criteria for high-risk behaviors in Australian blood donors. Transfusion. 2014 Jul;54((7)):1739–49. - PubMed

Publication types