Development of Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos Following Treatment Time of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Inhibitor
- PMID: 33977174
- PMCID: PMC8087258
- DOI: 10.12717/DR.2021.25.1.43
Development of Porcine Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos Following Treatment Time of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Inhibitor
Abstract
We examine the effect of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inhibitor treatment time on the in vitro development of porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) embryos. Porcine SCNT embryos were classified by four groups following treatment time of ER stress inhibitor, tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA; 100 μM); 1) non-treatment group (control), 2) treatment during micromanipulation process and for 3 h after fusion (NT+3 h group), 3) treatment only during in vitro culture after fusion (IVC group), and 4) treatment during micromanipulation process and in vitro culture (NT+IVC group). SCNT embryos were cultured for six days to examine the X-box binding protein 1 (Xbp1) splicing levels, the expression levels of ER stress-associated genes, oxidative stress-related genes, and apoptosis-related genes in blastocysts, and in vitro development. There was no significant difference in Xbp1 splicing level among all groups. Reduced expression of some ER stress-associated genes was observed in the treatment groups. The oxidative stress and apoptosis-related genes were significantly lower in all treatment groups than control (p<0.05). Although blastocyst development rates were not different among all groups (17.5% to 21.7%), the average cell number in blastocysts increased significantly in NT+3 h (48.5±2.3) and NT+IVC (47.7±2.4) groups compared to those of control and IVC groups (p<0.05). The result of this study suggests that the treatment of ER stress inhibitor on SCNT embryos from the micromanipulation process can improve the reprogramming efficiency of SCNT embryos by inhibiting the ER and oxidative stresses that may occur early in the SCNT process.
Keywords: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress inhibitor; Endoplasmic reticulum stress; In vitro development; Pig; Somatic cell nuclear transfer.
© Copyright 2021 The Korean Society of Developmental Biology.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Effects of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Inhibitor Treatment during the Micromanipulation of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in Porcine Oocytes.Dev Reprod. 2019 Mar;23(1):43-54. doi: 10.12717/DR.2019.23.1.043. Epub 2019 Mar 31. Dev Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31049471 Free PMC article.
-
Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress Inhibitor or Antioxidant Treatments during Micromanipulation Can Inhibit Both ER and Oxidative Stresses in Porcine SCNT Embryos.Dev Reprod. 2020 Mar;24(1):31-41. doi: 10.12717/DR.2020.24.1.31. Epub 2020 Mar 31. Dev Reprod. 2020. PMID: 32411916 Free PMC article.
-
Tauroursodeoxycholic acid improves pre-implantation development of porcine SCNT embryo by endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibition.Reprod Biol. 2016 Dec;16(4):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2016.10.003. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Reprod Biol. 2016. PMID: 27765486
-
Analysis of Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress Induced during Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT) Process in Porcine SCNT Embryos.Dev Reprod. 2018 Mar;22(1):73-83. doi: 10.12717/DR.2018.22.1.073. Epub 2018 Mar 31. Dev Reprod. 2018. PMID: 29707686 Free PMC article.
-
Meta-analysis of melatonin treatment and porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryo development.Anim Reprod. 2021 Nov 4;18(3):e20210031. doi: 10.1590/1984-3143-AR2021-0031. eCollection 2021. Anim Reprod. 2021. PMID: 34840610 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular Mechanism and Application of Somatic Cell Cloning in Mammals-Past, Present and Future.Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 9;23(22):13786. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213786. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36430264 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials