Isoniazid preventive therapy use among adult people living with HIV in Zimbabwe

Abstract

We assessed the prevalence of isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) uptake and explored factors associated with IPT non-uptake among people living with HIV (PLHIV) using nationally representative data from the Zimbabwe Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (ZIMPHIA) 2015-2016. This was a cross-sectional study of 3418 PLHIV ZIMPHIA participants eligible for IPT, aged ≥15 years and in HIV care. Logistic regression modeling was performed to assess factors associated with self-reported IPT uptake. All analyses accounted for multistage survey design. IPT uptake among PLHIV was 12.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11.4-14.1). After adjusting for sex, age, rural/urban residence, TB screening at the last clinic visit, and hazardous alcohol use, rural residence was the strongest factor associated with IPT non-uptake (adjusted OR (aOR): 2.39, 95% CI: 1.82-3.12). Isoniazid preventive therapy non-uptake having significant associations with no TB screening at the last HIV care (aOR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.54-2.78) and with hazardous alcohol use only in urban areas (aOR: 10.74, 95% CI: 3.60-32.0) might suggest suboptimal IPT eligibility screening regardless of residence, but more so in rural areas. Self-reported IPT use among PLHIV in Zimbabwe was low, 2 years after beginning national scale-up. This shows the importance of good TB screening procedures for successful IPT implementation.

Keywords: HIV; Isoniazid preventive therapy; TB/HIV coinfection; Zimbabwe; Zimbabwe Population-based HIV Impact Assessment; people living with HIV; sub-Saharan Africa.

Figure 1.

Flow diagram depicting inclusion and exclusion of PLHIV in analyses. *Those who were on ART for >3 months or were not on ART were considered eligible for IPT per the then-IPT guidance in Zimbabwe. Note: PLHIV: people living with HIV; ART: antiretroviral therapy; IPT: isoniazid preventive therapy.