Reply Letter to The Editor Regarding: Cytokine Drizzle-The Rationale for Abandoning The Term Cytokine Storm
- PMID: 33978609
- PMCID: PMC8526370
- DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001799
Reply Letter to The Editor Regarding: Cytokine Drizzle-The Rationale for Abandoning The Term Cytokine Storm
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Septic Shock Had the Highest Concentrations of Cytokines, Yet Patients With Autoimmune Diseases have Very Low Blood Levels of Cytokines, But Dramatically Respond to Cytokine Inhibitors: How Should We Really Look at This?Shock. 2021 Nov 1;56(5):873. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001798. Shock. 2021. PMID: 33978608 No abstract available.
-
Cytokine Drizzle-The Rationale for Abandoning "Cytokine Storm".Shock. 2021 Nov 1;56(5):667-672. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001769. Shock. 2021. PMID: 34652339 Review.
References
-
- McInnes IB, Schett G. Pathogenetic insights from the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet 2017;389:2328–37. - PubMed
-
- Remick DG. Cytokine therapeutics for the treatment of sepsis: why has nothing worked? Curr Pharm Des 2003;9:75–82. - PubMed
-
- Stolarski AE, Kim J, Zhang Q, Remick DG. Cytokine Drizzle – The Rationale for Abandoning “Cytokine Storm”. Shock 9000;Publish Ahead of Print. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
