Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;239(7):2171-2180.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-021-06128-2. Epub 2021 May 12.

Empathy-based tolerance towards poor norm violators in third-party punishment

Affiliations

Empathy-based tolerance towards poor norm violators in third-party punishment

Hui Ouyang et al. Exp Brain Res. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Third-party punishment (TPP) plays an important role in fairness norm enforcement. This study investigated how the economic status of proposers could modulate third parties' behavioural and neural responses to unfairness. Participants played a TPP game as third parties deciding whether to punish proposers after observing the offers from proposers while behavioural and electroencephalogram (EEG) data were recorded. The proposers were of either high economic status or low economic status, and the recipients were middle class. The behavioural results indicated that participants reported decreased punishment for poor-proposed unfair offers compared to rich-proposed unfair offers, and this effect was stronger for highly unfair offers. Neurally, greater P200, a component involved in empathy processing, was observed in response to highly unfair offers (i.e. 90:10 and 80:20) proposed by the poor, suggesting that when the targets of severe punishments were poor proposers, participants showed greater empathy for poor norm violators in highly unfair trials. Taken together, these findings help to elucidate that the third-parties tend to tolerate the norm-violating behaviours conducted by the poor and provided further neuroscience evidence for the influence of economic status of proposers on TPP.

Keywords: EEG; Economic status; Empathy; P200; Third-party punishment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baumgartner T, Götte L, Gügler R, Fehr E (2012) The mentalizing network orchestrates the impact of parochial altruism on social norm enforcement. Hum Brain Mapp 33(6):1452–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21298 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benenson JF, Pascoe J, Radmore N (2007) Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evol Hum Behav 28(3):168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.003 - DOI
    1. Bernhard H, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442(7105):912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04981 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boksem MA, De Cremer D (2010) Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Soc Neurosci 5(1):118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910903202666 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buckholtz JW, Marois R (2012) The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement. Nat Neurosci 15:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3087 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources