Empathy-based tolerance towards poor norm violators in third-party punishment
- PMID: 33978785
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06128-2
Empathy-based tolerance towards poor norm violators in third-party punishment
Abstract
Third-party punishment (TPP) plays an important role in fairness norm enforcement. This study investigated how the economic status of proposers could modulate third parties' behavioural and neural responses to unfairness. Participants played a TPP game as third parties deciding whether to punish proposers after observing the offers from proposers while behavioural and electroencephalogram (EEG) data were recorded. The proposers were of either high economic status or low economic status, and the recipients were middle class. The behavioural results indicated that participants reported decreased punishment for poor-proposed unfair offers compared to rich-proposed unfair offers, and this effect was stronger for highly unfair offers. Neurally, greater P200, a component involved in empathy processing, was observed in response to highly unfair offers (i.e. 90:10 and 80:20) proposed by the poor, suggesting that when the targets of severe punishments were poor proposers, participants showed greater empathy for poor norm violators in highly unfair trials. Taken together, these findings help to elucidate that the third-parties tend to tolerate the norm-violating behaviours conducted by the poor and provided further neuroscience evidence for the influence of economic status of proposers on TPP.
Keywords: EEG; Economic status; Empathy; P200; Third-party punishment.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Altruistic or fair? The influence of empathy on third-party punishment: an event-related potential study.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 15;20(1):nsaf042. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf042. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40314107 Free PMC article.
-
Receivers' responses are integrated into costly third-party punishment in a way that interacts with the unfairness of allocations.Brain Res Bull. 2024 Oct 15;217:111082. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2024.111082. Epub 2024 Sep 20. Brain Res Bull. 2024. PMID: 39307435
-
Punishment cost affects third-parties' behavioral and neural responses to unfairness.Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jul;177:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 9. Int J Psychophysiol. 2022. PMID: 35405147
-
Cross-societal variation in norm enforcement systems.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230034. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0034. Epub 2024 Jan 22. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024. PMID: 38244602 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do Bad People Deserve Empathy? Selective Empathy Based on Targets' Moral Characteristics.Affect Sci. 2022 Dec 5;4(2):413-428. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00165-y. eCollection 2023 Jun. Affect Sci. 2022. PMID: 37304566 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Altruistic or fair? The influence of empathy on third-party punishment: an event-related potential study.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025 May 15;20(1):nsaf042. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaf042. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2025. PMID: 40314107 Free PMC article.
-
To Blame or Not? Modulating Third-Party Punishment with the Framing Effect.Neurosci Bull. 2022 May;38(5):533-547. doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00808-3. Epub 2022 Jan 6. Neurosci Bull. 2022. PMID: 34988911 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baumgartner T, Götte L, Gügler R, Fehr E (2012) The mentalizing network orchestrates the impact of parochial altruism on social norm enforcement. Hum Brain Mapp 33(6):1452–1469. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21298 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Benenson JF, Pascoe J, Radmore N (2007) Children’s altruistic behavior in the dictator game. Evol Hum Behav 28(3):168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.10.003 - DOI
-
- Bernhard H, Fischbacher U, Fehr E (2006) Parochial altruism in humans. Nature 442(7105):912–915. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04981 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boksem MA, De Cremer D (2010) Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Soc Neurosci 5(1):118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910903202666 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buckholtz JW, Marois R (2012) The roots of modern justice: cognitive and neural foundations of social norms and their enforcement. Nat Neurosci 15:655–661. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3087 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources