Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;31(4):706-713.
doi: 10.1111/jon.12873. Epub 2021 May 12.

A nephroprotective iodinated contrast agent with cardioprotective properties: A pilot study

Affiliations

A nephroprotective iodinated contrast agent with cardioprotective properties: A pilot study

Elizabeth S Rowe et al. J Neuroimaging. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Evaluation and treatment of acute ischemic syndromes, in the heart and brain, require vessel visualization by iodinated X-ray contrast agents. However, these contrast agents can induce injury, in both the kidneys and target organs themselves. Sulfobutylether beta cyclodextrin (SBECD) added to iohexol (SBECD-iohexol) (Captisol Enabled-iohexol, Ligand Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA) is currently in clinical trials in cardiovascular procedures, to determine its relative renal safety in high-risk patients. Preclinical studies showed that SBECD-iohexol reduced contrast-induced acute kidney injury in rodent models by blocking apoptosis. The current study was undertaken to determine whether SBECD-iohexol is also cardioprotective, in the male rat ischemia-reperfusion model, compared to iohexol alone.

Methods: After anesthesia, the left coronary artery was ligated for 30 min and the ligation released and reperfusion followed for 2 h prior to sacrifice. Groups 1-4 were injected in the tail vein 10 min prior to ischemia with: (1) vehicle; (2) iohexol; (3) SBECD; and (4) SBECD-iohexol. Infarct size, hemodynamics, and serum markers were measured.

Results: An eight-fold increase in serum creatine kinase in the iohexol-alone group was observed, compared with no increase in the SBECD-iohexol group. The mean arterial pressure and rate pressure product were depressed in the iohexol-alone group, but not in the SBECD-iohexol group, or controls. No difference in infarct size or serum creatinine among the groups was observed.

Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that SBECD-iohexol is superior to iohexol alone, for both the preservation of cardiomyocyte integrity and preservation of myocardial function in myocardial ischemia.

Keywords: cardiotoxicity of contrast; contrast for interventional procedures; iodinated contrast safety; protection from contrast; safe.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (A) and rate pressure product (RPP) (B) in the rat model of ischemia/reperfusion (30 min/2 h) injury. Rats were treated with vehicle (saline, Group 1; n = 4), iohexol (1500 mg/kg, Group 2; n = 4), sulfobutylether beta cyclodextrin (SBECD) (225 mg/kg, Group 3; n = 3), or a combination of SBECD‐iohexol (1500–225 mg/kg, Group 4; n = 6). Animals in Groups 1–4 received an intravenous infusion of either vehicle or test article into the tail vein over a 2‐min period after the baseline (BL) period. Animals were monitored for the duration of the study. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Effect of iohexol (1500 mg/kg, Group 2), sulfobutylether beta cyclodextrin (SBECD) (225 mg/kg, Group 3), or a combination of SBECD‐iohexol (1500–225 mg/kg, Groups 4 and 5) on the circulating levels of creatine kinase (A) and creatinine (B) after ischemia/reperfusion (30 min/2 h) injury in the rat. Animals in Groups 1–4 received an intravenous infusion of either vehicle or test article into the tail vein over a 2‐min period after the baseline period; animals were then monitored for an additional 8 min. Animals in Group 5 received an intravenous infusion of the test article into the tail vein over a 2‐min period at the beginning of reperfusion. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. n = number of animals in each group
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Myocardial infarction in the rat model of ischemia/reperfusion (30 min/2 h) injury. (A) Area at risk (AAR; % of left ventricle [LV]) and (B) infarct size (IZ, % AAR) in rats treated with vehicle (saline, Group 1), iohexol (1500 mg/kg, Group 2), sulfobutylether beta cyclodextrin (SBECD) (225 mg/kg, Group 3), or a combination of SBECD‐iohexol (1500–225 mg/kg, Groups 4 and 5). Animals in Groups 1–4 received an intravenous infusion of either vehicle or test article into the tail vein over a 2‐min period after the baseline period; animals were then monitored for an additional 8 min prior to initiation of ischemia. Animals in Group 5 received an intravenous infusion of the test article into the tail vein over a 2‐min period at the beginning of reperfusion. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. n = number of animals in each group

References

    1. McCullough PA, Adam A, Becker CR, et al. Risk prediction of contrast‐induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol 2006;98:27K‐36K. - PubMed
    1. Chalikias G, Drosos I, Tziakas DN. Contrast‐induced acute kidney injury: an update. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2016;30:215‐28. - PubMed
    1. McCullough PA, Stacul F, Becker CR, et al. Contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN) consensus working panel: executive summary. Rev Cardiovasc Med 2006;7:177‐97. - PubMed
    1. Kocabay G, Karabay CY, Kalayci A, et al. Contrast‐induced neurotoxicity after coronary angiography. Herz 2014;39:522‐7. - PubMed
    1. Junck L, Marshall WH. Neurotoxicity of radiological contrast agents. Ann Neurol 1983;13:469‐84. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources