OpTrust: An Effective Educational Bundle for Enhancing Faculty-resident Intraoperative Entrustment
- PMID: 33979313
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003436
OpTrust: An Effective Educational Bundle for Enhancing Faculty-resident Intraoperative Entrustment
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure the efficacy of a novel faculty and resident educational bundle focused on development of faculty-resident behaviors and entrustment in the operating room.
Summary background data: As surgical training environments are orienting to entrustable professional activities (EPAs), successful transitions to this model will require significant faculty and resident development. Identifying an effective educational initiative which prepares faculty and residents for optimizing assessment, teaching, learning, and interacting in this model is critical.
Methods: From September 2015 to June 2017, an experimental study was conducted in the Department of Surgery at the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS). Case observations took place across general, plastic, thoracic, and vascular surgical specialties. A total of 117 operating room observations were conducted during Phase I of the study and 108 operating room observations were conducted during Phase II following the educational intervention. Entrustment behaviors were rated for 56 faculty and 73 resident participants using OpTrust, a validated intraoperative entrustment instrument.
Results: Multiple regression analysis showed a significant increase in faculty entrustment (Phase I = 2.32 vs Phase II = 2.56, P < 0.027) and resident entrustability (Phase I = 2.16 vs Phase II = 2.40, P < 0.029) scores following exposure to the educational intervention.
Conclusions: Our study shows improved intraoperative entrustment following implementation of faculty and resident development, indicating the efficacy of this innovative educational bundle. This represents a crucial component in the implementation of a competency-based assessment framework like EPAs.
Copyright © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Elfenbein DM. Confidence crisis among general surgery residents a systematic review and qualitative discourse analysis. JAMA Surg 2016; 151:1166–1175.
-
- Sandhu G, Magas CP, Robinson AB, et al. Progressive entrustment to achieve resident autonomy in the operating room: a national qualitative study with general surgery faculty and residents. Ann Surg 2016; 265:1134–1140.
-
- Chen X, Sullivan A, Alseidi A, et al. Assessing residents’ readiness for OR autonomy: a qualitative descriptive study of expert surgical teachers’ best practices. J Surg Educ 2017; 74:e15–e21.
-
- George BC, Bohnen JD, Williams RG, et al. Readiness of US general surgery residents for independent practice. Ann Surg 2017; 266:582–594.
-
- Hoops HE, Maynard E, Brasel KJ. Training surgeons in the current US healthcare system: a review of recent changes in resident education. Curr Surg Rep 2017; 5:32.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
