Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 May 12;16(5):e0250098.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250098. eCollection 2021.

Neonatal and infant mortality associated with spina bifida: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neonatal and infant mortality associated with spina bifida: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Peter Ho et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: A systematic review was conducted in high-income country settings to analyse: (i) spina bifida neonatal and IMRs over time, and (ii) clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with mortality in the first year after birth in infants affected by spina bifida.

Data sources: PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Web of Science, CINAHL, Scopus and the Cochrane Library were searched from 1st January, 1990 to 31st August, 2020 to review evidence.

Study selection: Population-based studies that provided data for spina bifida infant mortality and case fatality according to clinical and socio-demographical characteristics were included. Studies were excluded if they were conducted solely in tertiary centres. Spina bifida occulta or syndromal spina bifida were excluded where possible.

Data extraction and synthesis: Independent reviewers extracted data and assessed their quality using MOOSE guideline. Pooled mortality estimates were calculated using random-effects (+/- fixed effects) models meta-analyses. Heterogeneity between studies was assessed using the Cochrane Q test and I2 statistics. Meta-regression was performed to examine the impact of year of birth cohort on spina bifida infant mortality.

Results: Twenty studies met the full inclusion criteria with a total study population of over 30 million liveborn infants and approximately 12,000 spina bifida-affected infants. Significant declines in spina bifida associated infant and neonatal mortality rates (e.g. 4.76% decrease in IMR per 100, 000 live births per year) and case fatality (e.g. 2.70% decrease in infant case fatality per year) were consistently observed over time. Preterm birth (RR 4.45; 2.30-8.60) and low birthweight (RR 4.77; 2.67-8.55) are the strongest risk factors associated with increased spina bifida infant case fatality.

Significance: Significant declines in spina bifida associated infant/neonatal mortality and case fatality were consistently observed, advances in treatment and mandatory folic acid food fortification both likely play an important role. Particular attention is warranted from clinicians caring for preterm and low birthweight babies affected by spina bifida.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA diagram for the flow of articles through the review (1.1.1990 to 31.8.2020).
Fig 2
Fig 2. Neonatal mortality from spina bifida in Australia, the UK and the U.S. (Birth cohort: 1989–2003) [30,35,40].
Fig 3
Fig 3. Infant mortality from spina bifida in the U.S. and Canada (Birth cohort: 1982–2003) [3,30,33,34].
Fig 4
Fig 4. Neonatal case fatality from spina bifida in Australia, the U.S. and various European countries (Birth cohort: 1969–2010) [,,,,–40,42,43].
Fig 5
Fig 5. Infant case fatality from spina bifida in Australia, the U.S. and various European countries (1969–2003) [,,–31,37,38,42,43].
Fig 6
Fig 6. Maternal ethnicity.
Spina bifida infant case fatality risk factors.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Gestational age.
Spina bifida infant case fatality risk factors.
Fig 8
Fig 8. Birthweight.
Spina bifida infant case fatality risk factors.
Fig 9
Fig 9. Lesion level.
Spina bifida infant case fatality risk factors.
Fig 10
Fig 10. Presence of hydrocephalus.
Spina bifida infant case fatality risk factors.
Fig 11
Fig 11. Presence of multiple anomalies.
Spina bifida infant case fatality risk factors.
Fig 12
Fig 12. Risk of bias assessment summary table of the included studies.

References

    1. Kurinczuk J.J., Hollowell J., Boyd P.A., Oakley L., Brocklehurst P. and Gray R., 2010. Inequalities in infant mortality project briefing paper 4. The contribution of congenital anomalies to infant mortality. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, 2010.
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Modell B, Lawn J. Folic acid to reduce neonatal mortality from neural tube disorders. International journal of epidemiology. 2010. April 1;39(suppl_1):i110–21. 10.1093/ije/dyq028 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Davidoff MJ, Petrini J, Damus K, Russell RB, Mattison D. Neural tube defect‐specific infant mortality in the United States. Teratology. 2002;66(S1):S17–22. 10.1002/tera.90005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rosano A, Botto LD, Botting B, Mastroiacovo P. Infant mortality and congenital anomalies from 1950 to 1994: an international perspective. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2000. September 1;54(9):660–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. The lancet. 1991. July 20;338(8760):131–7. - PubMed

Publication types