Features of low functional load in mono- and bilinguals' lexical access: evidence from Swedish tonal accent
- PMID: 33979904
- DOI: 10.1515/phon-2021-2002
Features of low functional load in mono- and bilinguals' lexical access: evidence from Swedish tonal accent
Abstract
Swedish makes use of tonal accents (Accents 1 and 2) to contrast words, but the functional load is very low, with some regional dialects not even exhibiting the contrast. In particular given the low number of minimal pairs, the question is whether tonal word accent is used in lexical access. Here we present two cross-modal fragment semantic priming studies in order to address this question. Both experiments use first syllable fragments in order to prime semantically related targets. Experiment 1 utilises words whose first syllable occurs with both accent patterns, creating a situation in which there is lexical competition between words that differ solely in terms of accent. Experiment 2 removes this competition by using words that have no such accent competitors. Our results show that native speakers of Swedish use tonal word accent in lexical access: Accent mispronunciations failed to prime semantically related targets, regardless of whether primes had accent competitors or not. Results for a group of early bilingual speakers (who grew up with one Swedish-speaking parent and one other non-tonal language) showed no differences in processing compared to the monolinguals. This indicates that the extraction of accent features during acquisition and their use in lexical access is robust, even in a scenario where multiple input languages lead to tonal word accent being a useful feature for only some of the lexical items that are being acquired. There is no doubt that the accent system is well entrenched into the bilinguals' phonological system.
Keywords: bilingualism; lexical access; lexical tone; low functional load; pitch accent; semantic priming.
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.
References
-
- Abboub, Nawal, Ranka Bijeljac-Babic, Josette Serres & Thierry Nazzi. 2015. On the importance of being bilingual: Word stress processing in a context of segmental variability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 132. 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.004.
-
- Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1). 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
-
- Bijeljac-Babic, Ranka, Barbara Höhle & Thierry Nazzi. 2016. Early prosodic acquisition in bilingual infants: The case of the perceptual trochaic bias. Frontiers in Psychology 7(February). 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00210.
-
- Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2018. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.37, Retrieved 3 February 2018 from http://www.praat.org/.
-
- Bosch, Laura & Núria Sebastián-Gallés. 2003. Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life. Language and Speech 46(2–3). 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309030460020801.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources