Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 12;20(1):58.
doi: 10.1186/s12940-021-00736-9.

Characterizing environmental geographic inequalities using an integrated exposure assessment

Affiliations

Characterizing environmental geographic inequalities using an integrated exposure assessment

Julien Caudeville et al. Environ Health. .

Abstract

Background: At a regional or continental scale, the characterization of environmental health inequities (EHI) expresses the idea that populations are not equal in the face of pollution. It implies an analysis be conducted in order to identify and manage the areas at risk of overexposure where an increasing risk to human health is suspected. The development of methods is a prerequisite for implementing public health activities aimed at protecting populations.

Methods: This paper presents the methodological framework developed by INERIS (French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks) to identify a common framework for a structured and operationalized assessment of human exposure. An integrated exposure assessment approach has been developed to integrate the multiplicity of exposure pathways from various sources, through a series of models enabling the final exposure of a population to be defined.

Results: Measured data from environmental networks reflecting the actual contamination of the environment are used to gauge the population's exposure. Sophisticated methods of spatial analysis are applied to include additional information and take benefit of spatial and inter-variable correlation to improve data representativeness and characterize the associated uncertainty. Integrated approaches bring together all the information available for assessing the source-to-human-dose continuum using a Geographic Information System, multimedia exposure and toxicokinetic model.

Discussion: One of the objectives of the integrated approach was to demonstrate the feasibility of building complex realistic exposure scenarios satisfying the needs of stakeholders and the accuracy of the modelling predictions at a fine spatial-temporal resolution. A case study is presented to provide a specific application of the proposed framework and how the results could be used to identify an overexposed population.

Conclusion: This framework could be used for many purposes, such as mapping EHI, identifying vulnerable populations and providing determinants of exposure to manage and plan remedial actions and to assess the spatial relationships between health and the environment to identify factors that influence the variability of disease patterns.

Keywords: Exposure; Inequities; Integrated; Modeling; Spatial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Example of a modeling framework to characterize an integrated EHI
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Conceptual scheme of the modeling approach used in this study. Environmental data (blue) are integrated into models (green) which characterize the transfers of pesticide from the source to contamination of the target populations. The output data generated by these models (white) are themselves integrated as input data for the following model. The external and internal exposure doses (yellow) are estimated at the end of the modeling chain
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mapping for urinary concentrations of 3-PBA in the general population. a Mean annual urinary concentrations (lower bound); b) Mean annual urinary concentrations (upper bound)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean contributions of pyrethroids to cumulated 3-PBA urinary concentrations for the lower bound and upper bound scenarios

Similar articles

References

    1. WHO Regional Office for Europe . Environmental health inequities in Europe: assessment report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional office for Europe; 2012.
    1. Caudeville J, Bonnard R, Boudet C, Denys S, Govaert G, Cicolella A. Development of a spatial stochastic multimedia model to assess population exposure at a regional scale. Sci Total Environ. 2012;432:297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2005;14(8):1847–1850. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lioy PJ, Smith KR. A discussion of exposure science in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. Environ Health Persp. 2013;121(4):405–409. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206170. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bulle C, Margni M, Kashef-Haghighi S, Boulay AM, Bourgault G, De Bruille V, et al. IMPACT world+: a globally regionalized life cycle impact assessment method. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2019;1–22. 10.1007/s11367-019-01583-0, 24, 9.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources