Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 May 12;6(3):e00159-21.
doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00159-21.

A Cytopathic Effect-Based Tissue Culture Method for HCoV-OC43 Titration Using TMPRSS2-Expressing VeroE6 Cells

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A Cytopathic Effect-Based Tissue Culture Method for HCoV-OC43 Titration Using TMPRSS2-Expressing VeroE6 Cells

Ryohei Hirose et al. mSphere. .

Abstract

Human coronavirus (HCoV)-OC43 rarely shows a cytopathic effect (CPE) after infection of various cell lines, and the indirect immunoperoxidase assay (IPA), a relatively complex procedure, has long been used as an alternative assay. Because HCoV-OC43 uses cell-surface transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) for cell entry, VeroE6 cells expressing TMPRSS2 may show a clear CPE after HCoV-OC43 infection. The aim of this study was to construct a 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) assay for HCoV-OC43 based on CPE evaluation using VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells. VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells showed clear CPEs 3 to 4 days after low-titer HCoV-OC43 infection. Evaluation of viral kinetics indicated that the viral titer in the culture supernatant of VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells in the early stages of infection was higher than that of other cells. In comparison, between the CPE-based and the IPA-based (i.e., the reference titer) methods, the titer measured with CPE evaluation 4 to 5 days after infection using VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells showed a much smaller difference from the reference titer than that measured using other cells. Thus, the TCID50 assay using CPE evaluation with VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells provides the correct titer value and will greatly contribute to future research on HCoV-OC43.IMPORTANCE HCoV-OC43 rarely shows a cytopathic effect (CPE) in infected cell lines, and thus the plaque and TCID50 assays by CPE observation are not applicable for titration; the indirect immunoperoxidase assay (IPA) is used instead. However, the IPA is relatively complex, time-consuming, costly, and not suitable for simultaneous titration of many samples. We developed a TCID50 assay using CPE evaluation with TMPRSS2-expressing VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells that provides the same accuracy as the conventional IPA-based viral titration and does not require any staining procedures using antibodies or substrates. This titration method will greatly contribute to future research on HCoV-OC43 by allowing simple, low-cost, and accurate titration of this virus.

Keywords: 50% tissue culture infectious dose assay; HCoV-OC43; TMPRSS2; cytopathic effect; human coronavirus; titration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
CPE evaluation after high-titer HCoV-OC43 infection. First, HCT-8, VeroE6, and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and infected with high-titer (2.0 × 105 TCID50/ml) HCoV-OC43 samples, and their CPEs were evaluated from 1 to 5 days after infection. CPE was observed with an inverted light microscope (Olympus IX71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, or 5% fetal bovine serum after virus inoculation. Scale bar, 100 μm.
FIG 2
FIG 2
CPE evaluation after medium-titer HCoV-OC43 infection. First, HCT-8, VeroE6, and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and infected with medium-titer (2.0 × 103 TCID50/ml) HCoV-OC43 samples, and their CPEs were evaluated from 1 to 5 days after infection. CPE was observed with an inverted light microscope (Olympus IX71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, or 5% fetal bovine serum after virus inoculation. Scale bar, 100 μm.
FIG 3
FIG 3
CPE evaluation after low-titer HCoV-OC43 infection. First, HCT-8, VeroE6, and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and infected with low-titer (2.0 × 101 TCID50/ml) HCoV-OC43 samples, and their CPEs were evaluated from 1 to 5 days after infection. CPE was observed with an inverted light microscope (Olympus IX71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, or 5% fetal bovine serum after virus inoculation. Scale bar, 100 μm.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Viral kinetics of HCoV-OC43. HCT-8, VeroE6, and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were seeded in 12-well plates and infected with a specific titer of HCoV-OC43 (1.0 × 102 TCID50/ml). The viral titer in the culture supernatant of each well was measured from 1 to 6 days after infection. VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2% or 5% fetal bovine serum after virus inoculation. For each measurement, three independent experiments were performed, and the results are expressed as mean ± standard error values.
FIG 5
FIG 5
Comparison between CPE-based and IPA-based titer measurements. HCoV-OC43 sample solutions with titers of 2.0 × 105, 2.0 × 103, and 2.0 × 101 TCID50/ml were prepared as high-titer, medium-titer, and low-titer virus samples, respectively. High-titer (A), medium-titer (B), and low-titer (C) HCoV-OC43 samples were titrated with CPE evaluation and the IPA method. HCT-8, VeroE6, and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were used for viral titration, and VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 2% or 5% fetal bovine serum during the titration. For each measurement, four independent experiments were performed, and the results are expressed as mean ± standard error values. The reference titer value, which is the titer measured with IPA using HCT-8 cells, is indicated by the dotted red line on each panel.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van der Hoek L. 2007. Human coronaviruses: what do they cause? Antivir Ther 12:651–658. - PubMed
    1. Corman VM, Muth D, Niemeyer D, Drosten C. 2018. Hosts and sources of endemic human coronaviruses. Adv Virus Res 100:163–188. doi:10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shabani E, Dowlatshahi S, Abdekhodaie MJ. 2021. Laboratory detection methods for the human coronaviruses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 40:225–246. doi:10.1007/s10096-020-04001-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambert F, Jacomy H, Marceau G, Talbot PJ. 2008. Titration of human coronaviruses using an immunoperoxidase assay. J Vis Exp 14:751. doi:10.3791/751. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lambert F, Jacomy H, Marceau G, Talbot PJ. 2008. Titration of human coronaviruses, HcoV-229E and HCoV-OC43, by an indirect immunoperoxidase assay. Methods Mol Biol 454:93–102. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-181-9_8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources