A proposed "Radiological Evaluation Score for Bone Tumors" (REST): An objective system for assessment of a radiograph in patients with suspected bone tumor
- PMID: 33982208
- DOI: 10.1007/s12306-021-00711-0
A proposed "Radiological Evaluation Score for Bone Tumors" (REST): An objective system for assessment of a radiograph in patients with suspected bone tumor
Erratum in
-
Correction to: A proposed "Radiological Evaluation Score for Bone Tumors" (REST): An objective system for assessment of a radiograph in patients with suspected bone tumor.Musculoskelet Surg. 2022 Dec;106(4):383. doi: 10.1007/s12306-021-00716-9. Musculoskelet Surg. 2022. PMID: 34125399 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Although radiographs have been widely used in the evaluation of patients with suspected bone tumors, the lack of an objective radiological assessment method leads to a challenge in reaching correct diagnosis. The study aimed to propose a Radiological Evaluation Score for Bone Tumors (REST) which includes eight radiological factors [characteristics, content, cortical breach, distinctiveness, distribution, periosteal reaction, fracture, and soft tissue swelling] to form a single score along with its validation by multidisciplinary observers.
Methods: We reviewed the radiographs of 100 patients with a primary bone tumor which were selected at random from the database between January 2017 and January 2019 of a tertiary cancer center. Four reviewers (two orthopedic oncologists and two surgical oncologists) independently assessed the radiographs, based on the reporting system of REST. We constituted two groups according to the probable diagnosis of bone tumor (suspected benign tumor and suspected malignant tumor).
Results: The mean score in the suspected benign tumor group was 1.1 (range 0-3, 95% CI 0.8-1.3) and in malignant tumor group was 6.1 (range 2-8, 95% CI 5.8-6.4). A receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve for REST was with a cutoff of 3.5, with the most diagnostic value area under curve (AUC) of 0.99. The sensitivity was 98% and specificity was 100% with a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 98%. The inter-observer correlation coefficient was 0.985 (p value < 0.05), and Fleiss kappa value for the prediction of the benign or malignant lesion was 0.97 (p value < 0.05). The characteristics and content of tumor, cortical erosion, distinctiveness, distribution, periosteal reaction, and soft tissue mass had a significant correlation with the aggressiveness of bone lesion p value < 0.05.
Conclusions: The Radiological Evaluation Score for Bone Tumors (REST) is a structured reporting and objective method for the assessment of radiographs in patients with suspected bone tumors. This method is a reliable and helpful tool for clinicians in their outdoor patient department to differentiate a radiograph of a suspected benign tumor from a malignant bone tumor.
Keywords: Bone tumors assessment method; Objective scoring system for evaluation of bone tumors; REST; Radiological Scoring system for Bone Tumors; Radiological Evaluation Score for Bone Tumors.
© 2021. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
Similar articles
-
A proposed ''A to Z RAM (Radiograph Assessment Method)'' for triage of patients with a suspected bone tumour.Radiography (Lond). 2021 Aug;27(3):823-830. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 22. Radiography (Lond). 2021. PMID: 33487526
-
Accuracy of plain radiographs in diagnosing biopsy-proven malignant bone lesions.SA J Radiol. 2019 Dec 6;23(1):1768. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v23i1.1768. eCollection 2019. SA J Radiol. 2019. PMID: 31850149 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with benign and malignant bone tumors.Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5450-y. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 29948069
-
The current role of radiography in the assessment of skeletal tumors and tumor-like lesions.Eur J Radiol. 1998 May;27 Suppl 1:S77-85. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(98)00047-3. Eur J Radiol. 1998. PMID: 9652506 Review.
-
[Roles of magnetic resonance imaging in management of bone tumors].Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 2000 May;60(6):295-301. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 2000. PMID: 10860379 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Bone Reporting and Data System on MRI (Bone-RADS-MRI): a validation study by four readers on 275 cases from three local and two public databases.Insights Imaging. 2025 Jul 17;16(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02040-3. Insights Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40676311 Free PMC article.
-
Bone reporting and data system on CT (Bone-RADS-CT): a validation study by four readers on 328 cases from three local and two public databases.Insights Imaging. 2025 Aug 12;16(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02057-8. Insights Imaging. 2025. PMID: 40794221 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Peabody T (2004) The rodded metastasis is a sarcoma: strategies to prevent inadvertent surgical procedures on primary bone malignancies. Instr Course Lect 53:657–661 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical