Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Jul;10(13):4302-4311.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3969. Epub 2021 May 12.

Multi-institutional, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine to prevent recurrence in high-risk melanoma patients: A subgroup analysis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multi-institutional, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine to prevent recurrence in high-risk melanoma patients: A subgroup analysis

Robert C Chick et al. Cancer Med. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in combination with cell-based vaccines may produce synergistic antitumor immunity. The primary analysis of the randomized and blinded phase IIb trial in resected stage III/IV melanoma demonstrated TLPLDC is safe and improved 24-month disease-free survival (DFS) in the per treatment (PT) analysis. Here, we examine efficacy within pre-specified and exploratory subgroups.

Methods: Stage III/IV patients rendered disease-free by surgery were randomized 2:1 to TLPLDC vaccine versus placebo. The pre-specified PT analysis included only patients completing the primary vaccine/placebo series at 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare 24-month DFS among subgroups.

Results: There were no clinicopathologic differences between subgroups except stage IV patients were more likely to receive CPI. In stage IV patients, 24-month DFS was 43% for vaccine versus 0% for placebo (p = 0.098) in the ITT analysis and 73% versus 0% (p = 0.002) in the PT analysis. There was no significant difference in 24-month DFS when stratified by use of immunotherapy or CPI. For patients with resected recurrent disease, 24-month DFS was 88.9% versus 33.3% (p = 0.013) in the PT analysis. All benefit from vaccination was in the PT analysis; no benefit was found in patients receiving up to three doses.

Conclusion: The TLPLDC vaccine improved DFS in patients completing the primary vaccine series, particularly in the resected stage IV patients. The efficacy of the TLPLDC vaccine will be confirmed in a phase III study evaluating adjuvant TLPLDC + CPI versus Placebo + CPI in resected stage IV melanoma patients.

Keywords: cancer vaccine; immunotherapy; melanoma; personalized medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Faries is an advisor for Bristol Myers‐Squibb, Sanofi, Array Bioscience, and Pulse Bioscience. Dr. Hyngstrom has received funding from Castle Biosciences and Amgen. Dr. Berger has received funding from Castle Biosciences and Cardinal Health. Ms Park and Ms Sloan are employed by Orbis Health Solutions. Dr. Wagner is employed by Orbis Health Solutions and Perseus PCI and has received funding from Elios Therapeutics. Dr. Peoples is employed by Orbis Health Solutions and Cancer Insight; is a consultant for Rapamycin Holdings, Heat Biologics, Abexxa Biologics, and Pelican Therapeutics; and has received funding from the above as well as Sellas Life Sciences and Genentech.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Kaplan‐Meier curves demonstrating 24‐month DFS stratified by stage for the ITT analysis (1A, left) and PT analysis (1B, right). Log rank p‐values are displayed within each figure
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Kaplan‐Meier curves demonstrating 24‐month DFS in the PT analysis. Each arm is grouped by treatment arm (TLPLDC vs. placebo) and whether the patient received immunotherapy (IO) (yes/no, left) or checkpoint inhibitor (yes/no, right)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Kaplan‐Meier curves demonstrating 24‐month DFS stratified by Disease‐Free Interval, characterized as Recurrent or Primary disease, where Primary disease included patients without prior melanoma and those with a disease‐free interval of less than 3 months. Recurrent disease included patients with DFI >3 months
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Kaplan‐Meier curves demonstrating 24‐month DFS comparing TLPLDC vs. placebo for patients receiving ≥1 dose (A) top left, ≥2 doses (B) top right, ≥3 doses (C) bottom left, and ≥4 doses (D) bottom right

References

    1. Schadendorf D, van Akkooi ACJ, Berking C, et al. Melanoma. Lancet. 2018;392(10151):971‐984. 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31559-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eggermont AM, Chiarion‐Sileni V, Grob JJ, et al. Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1845‐1855. 10.1056/NEJMoa1611299. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weber J, Mandala M, Del Vecchio M, et al. Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage III or IV melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(19):1824‐1835. 10.1056/NEJMoa1709030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blank CU, Rozeman EA, Fanchi LF, et al. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab in macroscopic stage III melanoma. Nat Med. 2018;24(11):1655‐1661. 10.1038/s41591-018-0198-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Callahan MK, Kluger H, Postow MA, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma: updated survival, response, and safety data in a phase I dose‐escalation study. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(4):391‐398. 10.1200/jco.2017.72.2850. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources