Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 13;18(5):e1003572.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003572. eCollection 2021 May.

Assessment of the causal relevance of ECG parameters for risk of atrial fibrillation: A mendelian randomisation study

Affiliations

Assessment of the causal relevance of ECG parameters for risk of atrial fibrillation: A mendelian randomisation study

Parag Ravindra Gajendragadkar et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Background: Atrial electrical and structural remodelling in older individuals with cardiovascular risk factors has been associated with changes in surface electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters (e.g., prolongation of the PR interval) and higher risks of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it has been difficult to establish whether altered ECG parameters are the cause or a consequence of the myocardial substrate leading to AF. This study aimed to examine the potential causal relevance of ECG parameters on risk of AF using mendelian randomisation (MR).

Methods and findings: Weighted genetic scores explaining lifelong differences in P-wave duration, PR interval, and QT interval were constructed, and associations between these ECG scores and risk of AF were estimated among 278,792 UK Biobank participants (mean age: 57 years at recruitment; 19,132 AF cases). The independent genetic variants contributing to each of the separate ECG scores, and their corresponding weights, were based on published genome-wide association studies. In UK Biobank, genetic scores representing a 5 ms longer P-wave duration or PR interval were significantly associated with lower risks of AF (odds ratio [OR] 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87-0.96, P = 2 × 10-4 and OR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.93-0.96, P = 2 × 10-19, respectively), while longer QT interval was not significantly associated with AF. These effects were independently replicated among a further 17,931 AF cases from the AFGen Consortium. Investigation of potential mechanistic pathways showed that differences in ECG parameters associated with specific ion channel genes had effects on risk of AF consistent with the overall scores, while the overall scores were not associated with changes in left atrial size. Limitations of the study included the inherent assumptions of MR, restriction to individuals of European ancestry, and possible restriction of results to the normal ECG ranges represented in UK Biobank.

Conclusions: In UK Biobank, we observed evidence suggesting a causal relationship between lifelong differences in ECG parameters (particularly PR interval) that reflect longer atrial conduction times and a lower risk of AF. These findings, which appear to be independent of atrial size and concomitant cardiovascular comorbidity, support the relevance of varying mechanisms underpinning AF and indicate that more individualised treatment strategies warrant consideration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: PRG, AVE, MI, EVM, CFC, FM, AS and JCH work at the Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, which receives research grants from industry that are governed by University of Oxford contracts that protect its independence, and has a staff policy of not taking personal payments from industry; further details can be found at https://www.ndph.ox.ac.uk/files/about/ndph-independence-of-research-policy-jun-20.pdf. BC is supported by a British Heart Foundation (BHF) personal chair; her research is funded by two BHF Programme Grants, the BHF Centre for Research Excellence and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. She also receives in-kind research support from iRhythm and Roche Diagnostics. JCH is supported by a British Heart Foundation personal Fellowship; her research is also funded by grants from industry held in accordance with the policy detailed above, and the Nuffield Department of Population Health.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Associations between genetic scores and 12-lead ECG parameters in UK Biobank.
Association between quintiles of genetic scores for ECG parameters (defined in non-AF cases) and 12-lead ECG parameters in 13,314 participants in UK Biobank. Boxes represent mean values with their size inversely proportional to variance, and lines represent 95% CIs. A constant representing the population mean nongenetically predicted ECG interval was added to all genetic score values (the population mean of measured 12-lead ECG parameter excluding the genetic contribution; 93.2 ms for P-wave duration, 93.5 ms for PR interval, and 360.7 ms for QT interval) for display purposes. P calculated across the genetic score using linear regression adjusting for sex, genotyping array, and 40 principal components of ancestry. AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; ECG, electrocardiographic.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effects of genetically predicted ECG parameters on risk of AF in UK Biobank.
ORs for AF per quintile of genetic score (defined in non-AF cases) in 278,792 participants in UK Biobank. Boxes represent effect estimates with their size inversely proportional to variance. Solid lines represent 95% CIs calculated using floating absolute risks. ORs are adjusted for genotyping array, sex, and 40 principal components of ancestry. P calculated across continuous genetic score values adjusting for sex, genotyping array, and 40 principal components of ancestry. AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Effects of genetically predicted ECG parameters on the risk of lone AF and SVT in UK Biobank.
Effects of genetically predicted ECG parameters on risk of (A). “Lone” AF and (B). SVTs in UK Biobank. Ion channel scores for each ECG parameter include only genetic variants annotated to known ion channel genes. Boxes represent point estimates of effect per 5 ms higher ECG score with sizes inversely proportional to their variance, and lines represent 95% CIs. ORs are adjusted for genotyping array, sex, and 40 principal components of ancestry. AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; ECG, electrocardiographic; OR, odds ratio; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Effects of genetically predicted ECG parameters on risk of AF in UK Biobank and AFGen.
Ion channel scores for each ECG parameter include only genetic variants annotated to known ion channel genes. Boxes represent point estimates of effect per 5 ms higher ECG score, diamonds represent meta-analysis estimates, with sizes inversely proportional to their variance, and lines represent 95% CIs. UK Biobank derived ORs are adjusted for sex, genotyping array, and 40 principal components of ancestry. ORs for AFGen were calculated using inverse variance weighted fixed-effects methods from published summary data. AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; ECG, electrocardiographic; OR, odds ratio.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wijesurendra RS, Casadei B. Atrial fibrillation: Effects beyond the atrium? Cardiovasc Res. 2015;105(3):238–47. 10.1093/cvr/cvv001 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC Jr, et al.. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019;140(2):e125–e51. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, et al.. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijesurendra RS, Casadei B. Mechanisms of atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2019;105(24):1860–7. 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314267 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Magnani JW, Johnson VM, Sullivan LM, Gorodeski EZ, Schnabel RB, Lubitz SA, et al.. P wave duration and risk of longitudinal atrial fibrillation in persons >/ = 60 years old (from the framingham heart study). Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(6):917–21.e1. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.10.075 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types