Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction
- PMID: 33984171
- PMCID: PMC8363560
- DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13238
Review of Evidence-Based Methods for Successful Labor Induction
Abstract
Induction of labor is increasingly a common component of the intrapartum care. Knowledge of the current evidence on methods of labor induction is an essential component of shared decision-making to determine which induction method meets an individual's health needs and personal preferences. This article provides a review of the current research evidence on labor induction methods, including cervical ripening techniques, and contraction stimulation techniques. Current evidence about expected duration of labor following induction, use of the Bishop score to guide induction, and guidance on the use of combination methods for labor induction are reviewed.
Keywords: first stage of labor; intrapartum care, induction, amniotomy, transcervical catheter, oxytocin.
© 2021 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- American College of Nurse-Midwives. Induction of labor: Position statement. J Midwifery Women’s Health 2017;62(4):509–10. - PubMed
-
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of Labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386–97. - PubMed
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: Final data for 2017. National vital statistics reports: From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2018;67(8):1–50. - PubMed
-
- Supporting healthy and normal physiologic childbirth: A consensus statement by the American College of Nurse-Midwives, Midwives Alliance of North America, and the National Association of Certified Professional Midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health 2012;57(5):529–32. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
