Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;18(1):29-42.
doi: 10.1002/alz.12365. Epub 2021 May 13.

Harmonizing neuropsychological assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders in Europe

Marina Boccardi  1   2 Andreas U Monsch  3 Clarissa Ferrari  4 Daniele Altomare  2   5 Manfred Berres  6 Isabelle Bos  7 Andreas Buchmann  8 Chiara Cerami  9   10 Mira Didic  11   12 Cristina Festari  13 Valentina Nicolosi  13 Leonardo Sacco  14 Liesbeth Aerts  15 Emiliano Albanese  16 Jean-Marie Annoni  17 Nicola Ballhausen  18 Christian Chicherio  5 Jean-François Démonet  19 Virginie Descloux  17 Suzie Diener  20 Daniel Ferreira  21 Jean Georges  22 Anton Gietl  8 Nicola Girtler  23   24 Ingo Kilimann  1 Stefan Klöppel  25 Nicole Kustyniuk  25 Patrizia Mecocci  26 Nathalie Mella  27 Martina Pigliautile  26 Katrin Seeher  15 Steven D Shirk  28 Alessio Toraldo  29 Andrea Brioschi-Guevara  19 Kwun C G Chan  30 Paul K Crane  31 Alessandra Dodich  32   33 Alice Grazia  1 Nicole A Kochan  15 Fabricio Ferreira de Oliveira  34 Flavio Nobili  35   24 Walter Kukull  30 Oliver Peters  36 Inez Ramakers  7 Perminder S Sachdev  15 Stefan Teipel  1 Pieter Jelle Visser  7 Michael Wagner  37   38 Sandra Weintraub  39 Eric Westman  21 Lutz Froelich  40 Henry Brodaty  15 Bruno Dubois  41 Stefano F Cappa  9   10 David Salmon  42 Bengt Winblad  43 Giovanni B Frisoni  2   5 Matthias Kliegel  44 Consortium for the Harmonization of Neuropsychological Assessment for Neurocognitive Disorders (https://nextcloud.dzne.de/index.php/s/EwXjLab9caQTbQe)
Collaborators, Affiliations

Harmonizing neuropsychological assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders in Europe

Marina Boccardi et al. Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders, an international priority for valid and reliable diagnostic procedures, has been achieved only in specific countries or research contexts.

Methods: To harmonize the assessment of mild cognitive impairment in Europe, a workshop (Geneva, May 2018) convened stakeholders, methodologists, academic, and non-academic clinicians and experts from European, US, and Australian harmonization initiatives.

Results: With formal presentations and thematic working-groups we defined a standard battery consistent with the U.S. Uniform DataSet, version 3, and homogeneous methodology to obtain consistent normative data across tests and languages. Adaptations consist of including two tests specific to typical Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. The methodology for harmonized normative data includes consensus definition of cognitively normal controls, classification of confounding factors (age, sex, and education), and calculation of minimum sample sizes.

Discussion: This expert consensus allows harmonizing the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders across European countries and possibly beyond.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; cognitive assessment; diagnosis; mild cognitive impairment; mild neurocognitive disorders; standard neuropsychological assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

I. Bos received grants from Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking. H. Brodaty received personal fees from Nutrivia Australia. S. Cappa received personal fees from Biogen. W. Kukull received grants from National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (NIH/NIA). F. Oliveira received personal fees from Gerson Lehrman Group and Atheneum Partners.

O. Peters received personal fees from Biogen; grants and personal fees from Roche; and grants from Novartis, Janssen, Pharmatrophix, and Eisai.

P. Sachdev received grants from NHMRC Australia and personal fees from Biogen Pharmaceuticals.

D. Salmon received consulting fees from Biogen, Inc. and Aptinyx, Inc.

Teipel received personal fees from Roche Pharma AG, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, and Biogen.

P.J. Visser received grants from Innovative Medicine Initiative, ZONmW, and Biogen.

B. Winblad received advisory board fees from AlzeCure, Alzinova, and Axon Neuroscience.

The other authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consensus procedure used for defining the cUDS and the methods to generate harmonized normative values

References

    1. APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th. 2013.
    1. Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cerami C, Dubois B, Boccardi M, Monsch AU, Demonet JF, Cappa SF. Clinical validity of delayed recall tests as a gateway biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease in the context of a structured 5-phase development framework. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;52:153–166. - PubMed
    1. Frisoni GB, Boccardi M, Barkhof F, et al. Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):661–676. - PubMed
    1. Gibbons LE, Carle AC, Mackin RS, et al. A composite score for executive functioning, validated in Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants with baseline mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging Behav. 2012;6(4):517–527. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources