Harmonizing neuropsychological assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders in Europe
- PMID: 33984176
- PMCID: PMC9642857
- DOI: 10.1002/alz.12365
Harmonizing neuropsychological assessment for mild neurocognitive disorders in Europe
Abstract
Introduction: Harmonized neuropsychological assessment for neurocognitive disorders, an international priority for valid and reliable diagnostic procedures, has been achieved only in specific countries or research contexts.
Methods: To harmonize the assessment of mild cognitive impairment in Europe, a workshop (Geneva, May 2018) convened stakeholders, methodologists, academic, and non-academic clinicians and experts from European, US, and Australian harmonization initiatives.
Results: With formal presentations and thematic working-groups we defined a standard battery consistent with the U.S. Uniform DataSet, version 3, and homogeneous methodology to obtain consistent normative data across tests and languages. Adaptations consist of including two tests specific to typical Alzheimer's disease and behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. The methodology for harmonized normative data includes consensus definition of cognitively normal controls, classification of confounding factors (age, sex, and education), and calculation of minimum sample sizes.
Discussion: This expert consensus allows harmonizing the diagnosis of neurocognitive disorders across European countries and possibly beyond.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; cognitive assessment; diagnosis; mild cognitive impairment; mild neurocognitive disorders; standard neuropsychological assessment.
© 2021 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
I. Bos received grants from Innovative Medicine Initiative Joint Undertaking. H. Brodaty received personal fees from Nutrivia Australia. S. Cappa received personal fees from Biogen. W. Kukull received grants from National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (NIH/NIA). F. Oliveira received personal fees from Gerson Lehrman Group and Atheneum Partners.
O. Peters received personal fees from Biogen; grants and personal fees from Roche; and grants from Novartis, Janssen, Pharmatrophix, and Eisai.
P. Sachdev received grants from NHMRC Australia and personal fees from Biogen Pharmaceuticals.
D. Salmon received consulting fees from Biogen, Inc. and Aptinyx, Inc.
Teipel received personal fees from Roche Pharma AG, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, and Biogen.
P.J. Visser received grants from Innovative Medicine Initiative, ZONmW, and Biogen.
B. Winblad received advisory board fees from AlzeCure, Alzinova, and Axon Neuroscience.
The other authors report no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- APA. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th. 2013.
-
- Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Cerami C, Dubois B, Boccardi M, Monsch AU, Demonet JF, Cappa SF. Clinical validity of delayed recall tests as a gateway biomarker for Alzheimer’s disease in the context of a structured 5-phase development framework. Neurobiol Aging. 2017;52:153–166. - PubMed
-
- Frisoni GB, Boccardi M, Barkhof F, et al. Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease based on biomarkers. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):661–676. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources